1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Zielflug [23.3K]
3 years ago
13

Which statement best explains an artistic impact of the italian renaissance

History
2 answers:
Alex_Xolod [135]3 years ago
7 0
The best answer would be D
Alisiya [41]3 years ago
6 0
<span> The statement which best explains an artistic impact of the italian renaissance is the last one:  D. The use of perspective in art allowed more accurate representations. Renaissance brought into art more realistic vision of things, so artists become more concerned of form, they also started to focus on creating an illusion of space and depth on a flat surface.</span>
You might be interested in
why did the newly eatablished democracies of europe have trouble surviving in the years after world war 1
Lesechka [4]
Much of their resources had been depleted during the war, especially on the losing side.  What also added to this factor was that many towns and cities had been destroyed, and much of the farmlands and crops were damaged also.  So not only were the governments weakened after the war, they were also lacking soldiers to defend themselves in case of another war.  Germany eventually built up an military to start WWII later on in 1938 - 1939.  
7 0
3 years ago
The Twelve Tables was a written legal code for Rome. Highlight at least three of its important points and be sure to write your
worty [1.4K]

Answer:

The 12 tables were a codification of the customary law of the tribes that founded the Roman state, but was selected and amended according to the needs of the ruling class. they had a small number of provisions that regulate the exchange of goods, provides for severe sanctions against debtors, strict formalism of procedures, attachment to religion, etc. The main part of the law is dedicated to court proceedings and sanctions for torts. It contains several provisions on family and inheritance law, on the law of obligations and a few more provisions on property. One table is dedicated to public law and religion.

Explanation:

Roman law arose only when an attempt was made to codify the law of the Twelve Tables, the oldest Roman law passed 451 BC at the request of the plebeians to limit the arbitrariness of patricians. It got its name from the fact that it was written on twelve bronze plates and displayed on the Forum.

The text has not been preserved, but it has been reconstructed, probably not in its entirety, on the basis of quotations in the works of Roman jurists.

5 0
3 years ago
What do all supreme court cases have in common
sergejj [24]

Answer: The Most-Cited Supreme Court Cases All Have Something In Common These cases get around. By Kathryn Rubino. ... The top of the most-cited Supreme Court cases are not only used by federal courts ...

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the result of the Jewish-Roman War of 66 CE?
MrMuchimi

Answer: In the fall of ad 66 the Jews combined in revolt, expelled the Romans from Jerusalem, and overwhelmed in the pass of Beth-Horon a Roman punitive force under Gallus, the imperial legate in Syria. ... After the fall of the fortress of Jatapata, Josephus gave himself up, and the Roman forces swept the country.5 days ago

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
List the factors which brought The first world War?​
yanalaym [24]

1. Friends don’t let friends fight alone

A tangled web of strong political alliances among nations meant that most great powers felt obliged to help their partners once war was declared.

After the murder of an Austrian Archduke by Serbian assassins, Austria-Hungary prepared for war against Serbia, which was allied with Russia.

Once Russia mobilized, Austria-Hungary’s ally, Germany, declared war on both Russia and Russia’s ally, France. Great Britain and its empire, sympathetic to France, declared war on Germany (Canada was not consulted).

Alliances originally intended as defensive pacts ended up looking threatening to outsiders. This perilous network of allegiances is an accepted part of all narratives about the First World War. German historian Andreas Hilgruber was one of many who showed how dangerous and costly all of these alliances were.

2. Armed to the teeth

Europe in 1914 was armed to the teeth. Vast fleets of warships were being constructed, conscription was implemented in most of the great powers to allow large armies to be kept in reserve, weapons and ammunition were stockpiled, and detailed war plans were made.

The impact of the proliferation of the instruments of war as a cause of the outbreak of the conflict was highlighted by David Stevenson’s Armaments and the Coming of War (1996). A large army spoiling for a fight may well seek one out.

3. Capitalist imperialism

During the First World War, Vladimir Lenin, the father of the Soviet Union, wrote an essay entitled Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism (1917), in which he laid out the foundation of his own philosophy of communism.

He believed that the war was the product of capitalist financial monopolies within states, which created national rivalries and led the great powers into a destructive conflict over access to raw materials and undeveloped markets.

Others since have blamed imperialism itself and commercial interests.

4. War on a tight schedule

A.J.P. Taylor, one of the 20th century’s great historians, argued in War by Timetable (1969) that in 1914, thanks to relatively new transportation (railroad) and communications (telegraph and telephone) technologies, every European power believed that the ability to mobilize their armies faster than their neighbours would by itself deter war.

Every power drafted elaborate mobilization timetables so that they could outrace their potential opponents. When the crisis of 1914 occurred, none of the leaders really wanted war, according to Taylor, but each felt they had to mobilize faster than the others or lose the advantage.

They became the victims of their own logistical preparations, and Europe slid unwillingly but relentlessly into war. Barbara Tuchman’s book The Guns of August (1962) similarly identified the dangers of technology in causing conflicts to escalate rapidly.

5. Blame Germany

In the Treaty of Versailles that officially ended the war, Germany was made to accept the blame for causing the conflict, and after that German governments spent decades denying their sole responsibility.

They convinced many people, but after the Second World War, German historian Fritz Fischer looked into previously-classified archives for the first time. Fischer concluded in his book German War Aims in the First World War (1961) that Imperial Germany had deliberately provoked a general war as part of a policy of conquest much like that undertaken by Adolf Hitler’s Nazi Germany 20 years later.

Fischer’s conclusions remain controversial to this day.

6. No, blame Britain

The idea that Britain caused the war was the live grenade that firebrand historian Niall Ferguson lobbed into the debate when he wrote The Pity of War (1999), though Paul Schroeder had put forward a similar argument earlier.

Ferguson claimed that not only did British statesmen encourage France and Russia to oppose Germany, but that Britain’s own intervention turned a regional European brawl into a global war.

The British may not have directly started it, according to Ferguson, but they were liable for greatly expanding the scope of the war and making it drag on as long as it did.

7. People being people

Canadian historian Margaret Macmillan has published a major book, The War That Ended Peace (2013), which presents a synthesis of many different factors: alliances and power politics; reckless diplomacy; ethnic nationalism; and, most of all, the personal character and relationships of the almost uncountable number of historical figures who had a hand in the coming of war.

Her work helps to highlight the fact that for all the great and powerful forces that seemed to grind the world inexorably into war in 1914, everything ultimately came down to the beliefs, prejudices, rivalries, and schemes of a great array of personalities and people.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The Legislative Branch
    6·1 answer
  • Please help due soon:-( What invention made it more profitable to grow cotton? A. Steel plow B. Cotton gin C. Spinning wheel D.
    15·2 answers
  • Why did John Winthrop create “a city upon a hill”?
    14·1 answer
  • Which economic system is defined by a free market and private ownership?
    14·2 answers
  • Who is allowed to vote in japans elections?
    7·1 answer
  • What 2 countries formed the Non-Aggression pact?
    11·1 answer
  • Which letter shows how far Islam had spread by 732, a century after Muhammad's death?
    9·1 answer
  • Explain the event in detail: Tell it like an entry in an encyclopedia What happened?
    9·2 answers
  • What impact did the Hundred Years' war and the bubonic plague have on medieval europe
    14·2 answers
  • what goal did leonardo da vinci share with other high renaissance artist like raphael and michelangelo?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!