Answer:
False.
Explanation:
<u>The correct answer is linear</u>.
Linear religious view is the belief in which it is believed that the universe had a specific beginning and has a specific end. In this concept of history, it is believed that history is non-repetitive.
Whereas, Cynical concept of history it is believed that history repeats itself and is moving endlessly.
So, according to the definition, the correct answer is linear.
Its not that we allow it it just happens and noone can say anything about it even though its wrong
Answer:
It betters the economy of a nation.
Explanation:
Chinese and Islamic nations value trade because trade improves economy of a country. The goods produced in one country is sold to another country in exchange of currency which increases the foreign reserves of that country and will be able to buy their necessities from other countries. Those country who export many products to the world has great economy so that's why Chinese and Islamic nations give importance to trade.
The correct answer is no.
Alisha was under no obligation to help Timmy, <em>there is no such thing like</em> <em>duty to rescue.</em> There is no legal requirement in the United States to help and rescue someone who is in danger. Even in extreme situation, when a person sees a person falling into a river for example, the witness of the situation is no obliged to assist with help.
There are some cases with some important exceptions: if the defendant created the peril he is obliged to come to the plaintiff's aid, if the defendant started to rescue the plaintiff, he must continue to do so, if the defendant is in a special relationship with the plaintiff ( teacher-student, worker-employer), he is under duty to rescue him.
Alisha was under no duty to inform Timmy's parents of the danger facing him <em>but she should have done it nevertheless.</em> She should at least have phoned them if she didn't have the time to stop by. She knew the boy well and she should have cared more. The need to help the boy should have come from her moral guidance and not as a sense of duty to be performed.
Answer:
Explanation:
The Dred Scott Decision outraged abolitionists, who saw the Supreme Court's ruling as a way to stop debate about slavery in the territories. The divide between North and South over slavery grew and culminated in the secession of southern states from the Union and the creation of the Confederate States of America.