Pituitary, true, true i think lol
Answer:c. providing a basis for compromise.
Explanation:Providing a basis for compromise refers to when two parties in dispute agrees on resolving their issues without actual involving court trial. This means the person who has wronged the other party agrees to their suggestions of how they should compensate them and there is no argument about how the issue should be settled.
Answer:
TRUE
Explanation:
In the Schenck v. United States case, the US Supreme Court decided that the First Amendment could be restricted if the words spoken or printed represented a clear and present danger to society. Because of that, freedom of speech is not an absolute right, the government could restrict speech if the the words mean a clear and present danger to society.
B, i believe, it wouldn’t be D or A because both of those are on the positive side of an government.