I’d say the answer is B because C is too many points, as Jana has already had multiple mistakes or errors.
The argument of Reagan is most likely found in the following sentence:
<span>the Soviets challenged the Western alliance with a grave new threat, (this statement sounds most like an argument and least like a fact).
He supports this argument by mentioning things such as </span>
<span>SS-20 nuclear missiles - so we see that he supports the claim with a fact. However, he also mentions personal impressions, such as during his visits.
Therefore, the best answer is the following:
</span>
<span>C) Reagan’s evidence is relevant but is insufficient to prove his claims as it relies on his own personal beliefs.</span>
<span><span> That any Caplet or Montague to who fight will be punished by death</span></span>
“Members” is the subject.
