Answer:
The populist moment of 2016 drove multiple academic disciplines together in a
Kierkegaardian way. They realized that complacently living life forward in liberal
democracies now required an understanding life backwards of in terms of tribalism and
identity. An emerging consensus—that multiple ethnic identities should be contained within a
greater single civic/creedal identity—highlighted an enduring tension between two ready
components in sports: gamesmanship (the tribal reality of winning, mostly through
professionalism) and sportsmanship (the rule-of-law ideal of playing well, ideally through
amateurism). American football’s unique provenance as a highly commercial and physical
game within higher education’s ideals of intellectual and noncommercial educational
excellence, offers a unique study of the power of gamesmanship to shape sportsmanship while
illuminating its realistic and historic contained boundaries. This study anchors the
Explanation:
The primary mission of the United Nations is to help different countries, such as the United States, unite and maintain world peace. Also at the United Nations, country leaders address world issues such as climate change.
It was seen as unconstitutional.
So, a good answer to this would look at the following:
Economy:
The big difference between the North and South was the divide between industrial and agrarian. The Southern economy was heavily based on farming tobacco and cotton and used slave labor. The Northern economy developed into an industrial economy.
Social Structure:
Again, the Northern live was based around industrial bases located in urban centers. So, Northern social structures were based on merchant class structures while the Southern structure was based on who owned the largest plantation.
Daily Life:
Go into city v. country
Social Attitudes:
This is where the divide on slavery emerged. Religious differences between Unitarianism and Episcopal/Baptist faith fueled this
The concluding paragraph:
The question is asking you to take what you talked about above, particular in regards to geography, social structure, and daily life and apply it to the West. Does the West at the time sound more like New England's industrial urban centers or the South's spread out plantations in need of cheap workers?
Are there any answers to go with this question?
