I might can help you, I'm learning about the intolerable acts and Boston massacre and all that
What is the question you need help with??
Well, mostly because of the promise of wealth and power.
In the past, many of the strongest empires in Africa gained it powered due to the trade that they did with the Europeans
hope this helps
Assuming your options are <em>king's power expanded, a step toward providing nobles with legislative authority, trial by jury of peers, and expanded rights to all English citizens, </em>the correct answer is trial by jury of peers.
Magna Carta was a document made to reduce the power of the king, so the first option is definitely incorrect. Although the document was created to give more power to the nobles, they weren't supposed to have legislative authority, which is why that is incorrect too. The document didn't expand the rights of all English citizens, but rather only of nobles, so the last option is not true. This leaves us with trial by jury of peers, which meant that nobody could be imprisoned until he or she is judged in court first.
Answer:
Yes, there is. The 25th amendment to the Constitution can be used to remove the President, in the case that the President becomes unable to fulfill their duties, in the sense that they are physically incapable of doing them. This doesn't have to do with laziness or disagreements on policy, but with a President's mental fitness to actually do the job. The process works with the Vice President and a majority of the Cabinet voting to relieve the President of his or her duties, and then the Vice President takes the office of President. But after this, if two thirds of both houses of Congress do not vote to uphold the decision by the cabinet within 21 days, the powers and duties of the President are transferred back to the President, and taken away from the Vice President.
