I believe it is a Thesaurus.
Muhammad, the founder of Islam and the proclaimer of the Qurʾān.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Unfortunately, you did not include the text. Without the text, we do not know what you are talking about.
However, we did deep research to help you and can comment on the following.
If you are talking about the Declaration of Independence of the United States, then, the social contract that the government gets its power from the people is mentioned in the following excerpt: <em>"That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government..."</em>
Enlightenment thinker Thomas Hobbes was one of the thinkers that talked about the social contract.
Other Enlightenment philosophers such as John Locke also wrote about popular sovereignty.
Baron of Montesquious and Jean-Jaques Rosseau were other thinkers that proposed interesting ideas about the form of governments and people's rights, that influenced further independence movements and revolutions.
Answer:
According to Darwin and William James
Explanation:
Darwin and William James has suggested that the face of a person is not only a billboard that displays their feelings but it also feeds their feelings. This means that if a person is feeling down and is stressed or sad and decides to smile and meet someone with a smile than it is likely that the person will also start to feel happier. This is what the theorists have meant by feeding the feelings that when a person smiles they feel happier even if they were not happy before. Although, other researchers have presented different point-of-views in this regard as well and this topic is still being researched.
Answer: When this occurs, the evidence is usually rendered incompetent by the court.
Explanation:
The legal consequences if evidence is not handled properly the evidence is usually rendered incompetent by the court.
