1-In New York Times v. Sullivan, the supreme court ruled that statements about public figures are examples of libel only when th
ey are made with malice and reckless disregard for the truth. In which of the following ways does this ruling support a healthy democracy? (1 point)
A)It promotes competition among a variety of media sources
B)It allows people the freedom to criticize public officials
C)It fosters cooperation between the media and the government
D)It requires absolute certainty of all published information
2-Which of the following examples support the notion that a free press is an essential element of a limited government?
(Select 2)
A)Journalists are entitled to cover trials
B)We need a fourth branch of the federal government
C)It is difficult for public officials to win libel cases
D)Information can be withheld to protect national security
E)Proper search warrants can be applied to the media
1. B - It allows people the freedom to criticize public officials.
When the citizens had the freedom to cricitize its own government, the government would be forced to live up to a certain standard. This would dramatically reduce the complacency within the government body, and the government become more likely to listen and create legislations that satisfy the majority of people.
2. A. Journalists are entitled to cover trials
and
C. It is difficult for public officials to win libel cases.
Through this, the journalist could act as a middle man that connect what happen within the government body, transform it into pieces of information, and give it to the people so we can form our own opinion about it. Difficulties to win libel cases favours journalists because it allow them to criticize public officials without direct threat of of being sued for smearing their name.
<em><u>The ruling supports a healthy democracy as It promotes competition among a variety of media sources
</u></em>
<em><u>Examples supporting the notion that a free press is an essential element of a limited government are
</u></em>
A.<em><u>Journalists are entitled to cover trials
</u></em>
<em><u>And</u></em><em><u> </u></em>
B.<em><u>It is difficult for public officials to win libel cases.
</u></em>
Further Explanations:
When the citizens are granted freedom to judge their own government, then the government is compelled to raise up to a certain standards. This would theatrically lessen the satisfaction within the governmental body, and the government starts creating legislation satisfying the majority inhabitant.
Through Free Press journalists can act as a mediator connecting happenings within the governmental body.They transmute it into pieces of data and disperse it people so that they can conclude their own opinion. Hitches to triumph “libel cases” favors journalists and it allows criticism of public officials without the direct threat of being sued.
Learn More
:
starting in the1800s, members of the suffragist movement in the united states focused on women's right to <u>brainly.com/question/1298741
</u>
which of the following best describes the ottoman empire in the years just before world war I? <u>brainly.com/question/1487507
</u>
What was the main reason joseph Stalin created collective farms? Soviet farms were old-fashioned and inefficient. Collective farms would create many new jobs. Farmland could be turned into industrial land. Wasteful crop surpluses would be eliminated? <u>brainly.com/question/381562
</u>
I believe your answer would be B. failed to pass congress because in 1872 they ruled it unconstitutional until after sumner died they passed it finally in 1875