1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
gavmur [86]
3 years ago
12

During the 1790s, the Naturalization Act changed the process for becoming a US citizen by

History
2 answers:
JulsSmile [24]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Forcing new immigrants to wait longer before becoming citizens.

Explanation:

o-na [289]3 years ago
4 0
Hi! :)

Answer: Forcing new immigrants to wait longer before becoming citizens.

This act was created to slowed down the stream of immigrants and reduced the employment of citizens of United States.

Before this act, it only took around 5 years to become a citizen of United States.

After this act, that time has increased into 14 years.
You might be interested in
What type of bonding does a material most likely have if it has a high melting point, is solid at room temperature, and easily d
BabaBlast [244]

Answer: ionic bond i believe . dont take my word for it tho

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Match the following to describe the four classes of Roman society.
sweet-ann [11.9K]

Answer:

Explanation:

asan po yung pang match?

4 0
2 years ago
Which statement describes a similarity between the League of Nations and the United Nations? (4 points)
Verizon [17]

Answer:

I believe is B. both were set up to prevent the spread of communism

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Goku solos Jin Mori and Saitama
Vikki [24]

Answer:

what? Your question is?

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did some people support supply-side economics and others opposed it?
vovikov84 [41]

Answer:

Explanation:

I don't see how this is possible, but the answer seems to be A which is the only answer that makes sense.

Large tax cuts don't have anything to do with supply of goods. It does help consumption but that is not the same thing as supply side economics.

C is much truer for the aftermath of WWI than a general statement about Supply. I don't think it is the right answer.

It didn't call for increased government spending unless the government wanted the goods being produced.

I think I'd go with A. It is the most straight forward.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What two weapons were used during the Hundred Years war and changed warfare in Europe?
    13·1 answer
  • Helppp! 25 points!!!!!!
    12·2 answers
  • American involvement in World War I helped to ensure the passage of the Eighteenth Amendment, which?
    5·1 answer
  • "What defines a people?"
    9·1 answer
  • What did the League of Nations do after the Italian invasion of Ethiopia?
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following is a check against presidential power in the Constitution?
    12·1 answer
  • What is the similarities between Medieval Europe and Ancient China?
    13·1 answer
  • How did the Black Power movement impact the fight for civil rights?
    7·2 answers
  • In the 1500s, African societies were better than their European counterparts at_____.
    11·1 answer
  • Adolph Hitler saw political opportunity in Germany because ______. Select all that apply.
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!