Answer:Divergent thinking
Explanation: Divergent thinking is often referred to as creative thinking and is defined as “may follow many lines of thought”
According to recent estimates, genetic contributions to the development of most psychological disorders are <u>below 50%</u>
Many psychiatric diseases have a propensity to run in families, which suggests possible hereditary causes, as has long been acknowledged by scientists. These conditions comprise schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), autism, and ADHD.
Differentiating between these 5 major psychiatric diseases might be challenging due to the possibility of overlapping symptoms. They may have biochemical commonalities as well, based on their similar symptoms. In reality, current research has found only little evidence for genetic risk factors that are common to psychiatric diseases like schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, autism and schizophrenia, and depression and bipolar disorder.
To learn more about psychological disorders here,
brainly.com/question/14086335
#SPJ4
Answer:
Toronto Ontario
Explanation:
Toronto
Largest metropolitan areas in Canada in 2019, by population
Number of people
Toronto, Ontario 6,471,850
Bolivar stood apart from his class in ideas, values and vision. Who else would be found in the midst of a campaign swinging in a hammock, reading the French philosophers? His liberal education, wide reading, and travels in Europe had broadened his horizons and opened his mind to the political thinkers of France and Britain. He read deeply in the works of Hobbes and Spinoza, Holbach and Hume; and the thought of Montesquieu and Rousseau left its imprint firmly on him and gave him a life-long devotion to reason, freedom and progress. But he was not a slave of the Enlightenment. British political virtues also attracted him. In his Angostura Address (1819) he recommended the British constitution as 'the most worthy to serve as a model for those who desire to enjoy the rights of man and all political happiness compatible with our fragile nature'. But he also affirmed his conviction that American constitutions must conform to American traditions, beliefs and conditions.
His basic aim was liberty, which he described as "the only object worth the sacrifice of man's life'. For Bolivar liberty did not simply mean freedom from the absolutist state of the eighteenth century, as it did for the Enlightenment, but freedom from a colonial power, to be followed by true independence under a liberal constitution. And with liberty he wanted equality – that is, legal equality – for all men, whatever their class, creed or colour. In principle he was a democrat and he believed that governments should be responsible to the people. 'Only the majority is sovereign', he wrote; 'he who takes the place of the people is a tyrant and his power is usurpation'. But Bolivar was not so idealistic as to imagine that South America was ready for pure democracy, or that the law could annul the inequalities imposed by nature and society. He spent his whole political life developing and modifying his principles, seeking the elusive mean between democracy and authority. In Bolivar the realist and idealist dwelt in uneasy rivalry.
An example of a command economy is like the Soviet Union North Korea and Cuba
