Essentially, there are a lot of reasons as to why people turn to both religion and philosophy. This could have something to do with the way they were brought up or their very own beliefs. Each religion has different ways and teachings. For Medieval China, they were traditionally into Taoism and Confucianism since these two provided ethical guides to the proper behavior of individuals and officials. Taoism promoted the inner peace of individuals and harmony with their surroundings. Confucianism, based on the teachings of the famous philosopher Confucius, was an ethical system that sought to teach the proper way for all people to behave in society. <span>Each relationship--husband-wife, parents-children, ruler-subjects--involved a set of obligations which, if upheld, would lead to a just and harmonious society. Following his teachings would also promote a stable, lasting government.</span>
Answer:
In 1638 Anne Hutchinson was kicked out of Boston for “antinomianism.”
So Anne Hutchinson’s view says good character is not necessary for salvation. This is to be “anti-nonmain” — “against law.” The opposite is to make law central — “legalism.” Legalism goes the opposite way and says good character is what is necessary for salvation. But then how good do you have to be? Is anyone really good enough? Can anyone conform to law enough? Perhaps not. No one is perfect. People have weaknesses, secret needs and habits. So we may need some “antinomianism.” If you aren’t good enough but get the benefit anyway, that’s called forgiveness. It seems like forgiveness must be required to go to heaven. Forgiveness negates the necessity of the law. It says you didn’t follow the law properly but it’s okay. If in reality we’re all a bunch of greedy , then we might need a bit of antinomianism to go to heaven. This fundamental problem of Christian religion goes all the way back to the founding and continues today. It’s an inherent logical problem of Christian faith.
Explanation:
The <span>Teapot Dome scandal, oil scandal and Ohio Gang scandal.
These scandals made the American citizens lose faith in the government. </span>
Answer:The 1803 case Marbury vs. Madison showed that the Supreme Court is a check against legislative power.
The Marbury vs. Madison case became the base of judicial review in United States.
Explanation:
The south East including Florida, Georgia, Texas, New Mexico, and Arizona.
