1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
AlladinOne [14]
2 years ago
14

What is the difference between the stamp act and the sugar act

History
2 answers:
snow_tiger [21]2 years ago
8 0
The Stamp Act was a order given by the British crown that all printed goods in America must be printed on paper from London and carry a revenue stamp on the paper products. The Sugar act was a tax on sugar enacted to bring revenue to the British, since they were fighting a war with the French, funds were needed.
Mnenie [13.5K]2 years ago
7 0
The Stamp Act put a law stating taxes (stamps) had to be put on every article item, from newspapers to a deck of cards to a marriage document.

However, the Sugar Act put a law stating taxes had to be put on imports such as sugar and molasses instead. Additional goods were also taxed such as coffee.
You might be interested in
In Europe in the 1930s, economic instability led to the
Black_prince [1.1K]
 The correct answer is the 1 choice, economic instability led to the rise of fascist dictatorship. 
3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who has the record for the longest filibuster, 24 hours and 18 minutes in 1957?
Ahat [919]
The person who has the record for the longest filibuster, 24 hours and 18 minutes in 1957, would be "<span>C. Strom Thurmond," since he refused to even take a bathroom break. </span>
7 0
2 years ago
Which policy was adopted by the United States in 1939 and allowed warring nations to buy war materiel from the United States if
Alex Ar [27]

Answer:

Cash and carry the Neutrality Act

4 0
2 years ago
Make a list of reasons that deseret was able to flourish
katen-ka-za [31]
Is there a article to this?
7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
(I am having trouble understanding what this question is asking)
bagirrra123 [75]

Both Andrew Carnegie Mellon and Henry Clay Frick were industrialists and business partners. Carnegie produced steel and Frick manufactured coke (necessary to produce steel). Frick eventually became chairman of Carnegie's company, but Carnegie made several attempts to force him to renounce to his position and disregarded him, and his opinions, on numerous occasions. This is, therefore, an example of the tensions that the industrialization of the U.S. entailed (there were companies that merged with, or sometimes bought, other companies; companies that used black workers and convicts as labor; companies whose workers went on strike; and hostility towards the wealthy industrialists as well as between them).  

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Bakit kaya nagawa ni adrian ang pangyayaring iligaw sa gubat ang ama​
    8·1 answer
  • What was one way that the United States profited from World War I?
    6·1 answer
  • who was tecumseh? a shawnee leader who led american indian resistance to us settlement in the ohio river valley a miami chieftai
    12·2 answers
  • ¿Cómo cambió la concepción del mundo para las personas de Europa cuando encontraron nuevas rutas comerciales?
    8·2 answers
  • What does President Nixon imply about the United
    8·2 answers
  • Why were creationists opposed to the teaching of evolution
    9·1 answer
  • Regarding education, state governments *
    10·1 answer
  • Accused persons have the right to
    13·2 answers
  • Pretend you are a colonist leader about to speak to the King of England. Write a speech making an argument against the Coercive/
    10·1 answer
  • What examples does the proclamation offer to support its argument?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!