From what you know about the Constitution, do you agree with Patrick Henry's statement? Why or why not?

1 answer:

3 0

1. Yes i do, cause the government can easily power over the people but as soons as they do that the people will then take back the government there fore the constitution is not used by the government to control us cause if they did we could easily over turn them

2. there take of the constitution under my understanding is that if the government does something that makes the people unhappy they can look back at the constitution and say you are braking this law and now you are being over turned.

3.the social contract says that it obtains to everyone not just the people that arent in some type of government or the richest person ever it obtains to everyone. so his statment reflect cause hes saying that if the government tries to say something to use we can something back and say the constitution says we are allowed to do that or we arent. for example the right to carry a weapon we are but its not because of we like to hunt or go target shooting no its because if the government turns on us we can protect our selfs.

Read more on Brainly.com - brainly.com/question/1137967#readmore

You might be interested in

Who helped pay for settling the James River Colony?

vladimir1956 [14]

It was funded by joint-stock company in England. After settlers established an outpost (James River colony), company's money was used to tur it into a permanent settlement called Jamestown.<span> It was the first case like this.</span>

3 0

3 years ago

Renaissance culture different from the culture of the middle ages. which of the following is an example of the culture of the mi

Fofino [41]

C scholasticism was emphasized

4 0

3 years ago

What types of persecution did the Roma face before, during, and after the Holocaust?

Oxana [17]

Answer:

n 1933, police in Germany began more rigorous enforcement of pre-Nazi legislation against those who followed a lifestyle labeled "Gypsy." The Nazis judged

Explanation:

3 0

2 years ago

What was the Long term legacy of Vietnam War

Lana71 [14]

The Vietnam War usually has a negative legacy in the eyes of American citizens. This war caused the lives of thousands of US soldiers and involved hundreds of millions of dollars spent by the federal government. Many citizens did not agree with/understand why we were putting so many resources into a country that was thousands of miles away. This resulted in hundreds of protests across the US.

Along with the "waste" of resource/soldiers, citizens also disliked the way in which the US government used tactics that resulted in the deaths of innocent civilians. The use of Agent Orange was a perfect example, as this herbicide had detrimental health effects on thousands of innocent Vietnamese citizens.

8 0

2 years ago

Explain whether the Congress of Vienna was successful in its goals?

kotykmax [81]

Explanation:

The Congress of Vienna was a success because the congress got a balance of power back to the European countries. The congress also brought back peace among the nations. Europe had peace for about 40 years. ... Yes, because in the end, they did many things that benefited France such as maintain a balance of power in France.

6 0

2 years ago