Spiders especially Arachne
There should be a comma between the words 'Wisconsin' and 'whose'
because since there is a peiod, the senences read
georgia o'kefe was an american painter from wisconson, meaning: georga o'keef, american, from wisconson
second one
whose detailed close-ups of flowers brought her world renown
this is a clause, the two sentances should be joined with a comma because theh though continues
the sentances should read:
"Georgia O'Keefe was an American painter from Wisconsin, whose detailed close-ups of flowers brought her world renown."
Answer:
Easygoing
Explanation:
The only adjective in the given sentence is<em> easygoing</em> (= <em>relaxed and casual in style or manner</em>).
<em>The</em> is a definite article.
<em>Astronauts</em> is a noun.
<em>Were</em> is a verb.
<em>Not</em> is an adverb.
<em>Like</em> is a conjunction.
<em>Supergirl</em> is a noun.
<em>Was</em> is a verb.
You get to see the emotions that the playwrite intended rather than attempting to imagine it
Answer:
I believe school should not have clothing restrictions and let me tell you why .
I believe schools should not have rules of conduct regarding with clothing restrictions because one of many reasons .Firstly , numerous of kids in todayś society express their selves in clothing wear . The clothing can either vary from crop tops to easily being flip flops . However, we do have antagonists against this debation . Some people believe that clothing can be too revealing too others possibly even cause hazards as well . This debation puts a great argument in place .
Clothing wear is a expressive outlet too society today because it gives a chance for kids to be their selves . it is a fact that students who are against school uniforms argue that they lose their self-identity when they lose their right to express themselves through fashion. This proclaims the fact that kids can lose the ideal of expression because the school districts takes that away .
The other side of the argument believes that clothing can be hazardous or too revealing too others . In fact 1/3 school injuries have been caused by shoes not being sturdy enough . For example flip flops , and heels . This side does provide a good argument . However whoś side are you on ? who do you believe has a stronger argument.
This is all up for a debation , The argument still stands strong today. Do you believe that clothing restrictions should be lifted ? Or do you believe that they should be in use for protection of others ? You decide .
Explanation:
I hope I helped . I wrote this out of my own type . No plagrisim involved . I did it all on my own . You have a nice night or day . Xoxox.
