For what? Like what lesson?
The author shows a favorable bias towards Mendel's research and an unfavorable bias towards the opinions of Mendel's scientific peers, by using specific diction such as “deep impact” when referring to Mendel's work and “very little understanding” when expressing the beliefs of scientists, as shown in option C.
We can arrive at this answer because:
- Diction is very important for an author to be able to express their thoughts within a text.
- In "The Journey to Acceptance," we can see the efficient use of diction when the author states that Mendel's research had a "profound impact" on the scientific community.
- With this, the author shows a favorable bias to Mendel's research, stating that it is important and its impact was essential.
- On the other hand, the author states that Mendel's peer opinions are not as relevant as they are of “very small understanding.”
- With that, he shows a negative bias, claiming that the opinions of Mendel's peers are not as relevant.
It is important to point out that diction refers to the use of specific words to expose a message through a text.
More information:
brainly.com/question/5308214?referrer=searchResults
Franklin D Roosevelt uses pathos more often in his speeches than ethos and logos.
I just read a summary of Chapter 10 in The Fellowship of the Ring, .
I think Strider <span> offered to share what he knows with Frodo and give him advice so that Frodo and his friends will accept Strider as their guide.
His exact words to Frodo were:
</span><span>'Don't be alarmed!... I will tell you what I know, and give you some good advice — but I shall want a reward.'</span><span>
'Just this: you must take me along with you, until I wish to leave you.'
</span><span>
Later on in their conversation, it was revealed that Strider was actually Aragorn and he was a close friend to Gandalf.
</span>
Memorie lost like Alzheimer’s which is wrong
