The answer would be B. Crown Colony
Evidence that can be used to modify or refute what Stannard said about Columbus would be (D) examples of long-term benefits for people in Europe and Asia that resulted from the voyages by Columbus.
<h3>What did Stannard think of Columbus?</h3>
David Stannard thinks very lowly of Christopher Columbus as a result of the latter's crimes in North America which included the killing and mutilating of Native Americans.
David Stannard believed that the exploration of the Americas brought only long-term pain to Native Americans so a view that would refute this would have to show descriptions that Native Americans enjoyed some long term benefits thanks to Columbus.
Find out more on Christopher Columbus at brainly.com/question/15581111
#SPJ1
Had no effect on the war I think because it was fought after the treaty was already signed.
Since they produced inferior quality steel, this is a failure. Therefore, this means that the Chinese government failed to invest in industrialization.
P.S. Having been to China a few months ago, they don't have backyard furnaces anymore :)
The representative will realize that pollution is an issue important to the people he represents (APEX)