Answer: Monetary Compensation
Explanation:
This question relates to the shipwrecked sailors Dudley and Stevens who killed and ate a fellow sailor named Brooks in order to survive the ordeal. A criminal case was brought by the state in <em>The Queen vs Dudley and Stephens</em> wherein they were sentenced to death but subsequently released after about 6 months.
If a Civil case had been brought against them, the Plaintiffs would be asking for monetary relief or compensation because in Civil Court the punishment is either monetary compensation or an order to the defendant to fulfil their obligation in the contract in dispute.
As Brooks was already dead, the only logical relief the plaintiffs could receive would be monetary compensation not unlike what OJ Simpson was ordered to pay the family of Ron Goldman when he was found liable for Goldman's murder in civil court.
The States are allowed to find solution and make a decision about the issue. There are equal powers with the Federal and States therefore, the issue can be debated. Since federal powers are superior, the Constitution makes the decision. The national government shall create specific rules for each of the States.
Charlemagne restored him and protected him from being driven out again
hope this helps
People who serve on juries have a greater respect for the system when they leave. Serving on a jury educates the person serving about the flaws in Miscomprehension about the courtroom. It also allows one to possibly bring someone to justice depending on the case in hand.
Hope this helps :)
Explanation:
in Britain turnpike trusts were generally succesful in increasing road maintenance and investment.On average they spent 10 and 20 times more than the parishes they replaced.Most trusts purchased land and materials in order to widen their roads and improve the surface.
