Avoid wikipedia, anyone can put answers down on there and make it seem correct but it is not. Do not trust any website research the websites or look at ratings if possible. Use the answers that google provides itself if possible. And research trusted websites.
If this helped please mark me as brainlest.
![\left[\begin{array}{ccc}Thanks,\\JustSomeIdiot\end{array}\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bccc%7DThanks%2C%5C%5CJustSomeIdiot%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D)
Answer:
x is assigned "5", y is assigned "28", and ch is assigned "$"
Explanation:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
int main()
{
int x,y;
char ch;
x = 5;
y = 28;
ch = 36;
cout<<x<<endl<<y<<endl;
cout<<ch;
return 0;
}
Answer: ......wlc;)
Explanation: Any information or data sent to a computer for processing is considered input. Input or user input is sent to a computer using an input device. The picture is an illustration of the difference between input and output. The input example (top) shows data being sent from a keyboard to a computer
Answer:
The answer is letter C
Explanation:
Systems used by many providers require customers to share bandwidth with neighbors
The distinction between "computer architecture" and "computer organization" has become very fuzzy, if no completely confused or unusable. Computer architecture was essentially a contract with software stating unambiguously what the hardware does. The architecture was essentially a set of statements of the form "If you execute this instruction (or get an interrupt, etc.), then that is what happens. Computer organization, then, was a usually high-level description of the logic, memory, etc, used to implement that contract: These registers, those data paths, this connection to memory, etc.
Programs written to run on a particular computer architecture should always run correctly on that architecture no matter what computer organization (implementation) is used.
For example, both Intel and AMD processors have the same X86 architecture, but how the two companies implement that architecture (their computer organizations) is usually very different. The same programs run correctly on both, because the architecture is the same, but they may run at different speeds, because the organizations are different. Likewise, the many companies implementing MIPS, or ARM, or other processors are providing the same architecture - the same programs run correctly on all of them - but have very different high - level organizations inside them.
