Answer:
C.) While both the Ottoman Empire and Western European states relied heavily on forced conversions to expand and maintain their empires, the Ottoman Empire remained more religiously tolerant than the Western European empires.
Explanation:
I got this question right on the first try. Here's why I knew it was C. You would need to have some knowledge about the Ottoman Empire's role of religion. I don't know if it says in the passage, so if you do find it, then give me a heads up. Remember, how did the Ottoman Empire treat the minorities? Did they force persecution/conversion to Islam? Well, not really. Although they did develop the devshirme system, it was kinda of a force conversion because the children had to give up their Christian belief, but it was seen as an opportunity. They weren't punished, so answer A is not right. So they did practice religious tolerance. Also the Ottoman Empire tried to expand the empire to make it bigger as well. There wasn't any religious wars carried out the Ottoman Empire, and answer B does not make sense. Where in the passage does it say about those two empires having efforts of doing mass conversions. Look at Source 2. Sorry if this explanation is long, but I hope this helps :)
1. it stopped the spread of slavery north of the Ohio river
Can you please reframe this answer
The people who would of opposed Hamilton’s plans would of been that of the Democratic-Republicans who more less followed behind Thomas Jefferson. They believed that the country should be passed around that of a strict interpretation of the constitution with the thought that the economy should be based around that of agricultural rather than trade. The group was worried about Hamilton’s plans because they believed that it gave too much power to the government & opposed the national bank. They didn’t want a repeat of what they had experienced with Great Britain
