1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
jeka94
3 years ago
5

Besides the devastation from war, what was the underlying cause of the Marshall Plan?

History
1 answer:
Feliz [49]3 years ago
4 0
To promote democracy in Europe
You might be interested in
True/false. During the Paris peace talks, more nations favored a just peace than a peace of vengeance
kari74 [83]
No, it is false that during <span>the Paris peace talks, more nations favored a just peace than a peace of vengeance, since in fact it was the other way around (which proved to be a very bad idea). </span>
6 0
3 years ago
Which country was most concerned with Germany gaining too much power?
dangina [55]

Answer:

the American they didn't want them having to much power

8 0
3 years ago
What was the Great Compromise and how did it compare to the Virginia and New Jersey Plans?
Elis [28]

The Great Compromise <em>(Or the Connecticut Compromise of July 16, 1787) </em>was a compromise began by Roger Sherman and Oliver Ellsworth, in which <u>it was stablished a Congress representation bicameral system</u>, compound of the Senate and the House of Representatives, where in the Senate it'd be assigned an equal seats number by state, but in the House of Representatives, there would be assigned a seats number according to each state population proportion.

And the Great Compromise was compared to the Virginia and New Jersey Plans, <u>because that Compromise arised from a disccordance between the Virginia Plan</u> <em>(Or the James Maddison's plan) </em><u>and the New Jersey Plan </u><em>(Or the Paterson’s New Jersey Plan)</em> that were presented in the Convention of May 14 to September 17, 1787, in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Moreover, the Virginia Plan proposed important changes in the Congress structure, stablishing a Bicameral system, but by other side the New Jersey plan was based in the confederation articles, stablishing an Unicameral congress System, so to resolve those diferences, on June 11, 1787, Roger Sherman and Oliver Ellsworth <u>proposed the Connecticut Compromise, where were included proposals from both plans.</u>

5 0
3 years ago
Identify the early stages taken during the criminal law process.
ivolga24 [154]

Arrest

Criminal prosecution typically begins with an arrest by a police officer. A police officer may arrest a person if (1) the officer observes the person committing a crime; (2) the officer has probable cause to believe that a crime has been committed by that person; or (3) the officer makes the arrest under the authority of a valid arrest warrant. After the arrest, the police books the suspect. When the police complete the booking process, they place the suspect in custody. If the suspect commited a minor offense, the policy may issue a citation to the suspect with instructions to appear in court at a later date.

Bail

If a suspect in police custody is granted bail, the suspect may pay the bail amount in exchange for a release. Release on bail is contingent on the suspect's promise to appear at all scheduled court proceedings. Bail may be granted to a suspect immediately after booking or at a later bail review hearing. Alternatively, a suspect may be released on his "own recognizance." A suspect released on his own recognizance need not post bail, but must promise in writing to appear at all scheduled court appearances. Own recognizance release is granted after the court considers the seriousness of the offense, and the suspect's criminal record, threat to the community and ties to family and employment.

Arraignment

The suspect makes his first court appearance at the arraignment. During arraignment, the judge reads the charges filed against the defendant in the complaint and the defendant chooses to plead "guilty," "not guilty" or "no contest" to those charges. The judge will also review the defendant's bail and set dates for future proceedings.

Preliminary Hearing or Grand Jury Proceedings

The government generally brings criminal charges in one of two ways: by a "bill of information" secured by a preliminary hearing or by grand jury indictment. In the federal system, cases must be brought by indictment. States, however, are free to use either process. Both preliminary hearings and grand juries are used to establish the existence of probable cause. If there is no finding of probable cause, a defendant will not be forced to stand trial.

A preliminary hearing, or preliminary examination, is an adversarial proceeding in which counsel questions witnesses and both parties makes arguments. The judge then makes the ultimate finding of probable cause. The grand jury, on the other hand, hears only from the prosecutor. The grand jury may call their own witnesses and request that further investigations be performed. The grand jury then decides whether sufficient evidence has been presented to indict the defendant.

Pre-Trial Motions

Pre-trial motions are brought by both the prosecution and the defense in order to resolve final issues and establish what evidence and testimony will be admissible at trial.

Trial

At trial, the judge or the jury will either find the defendant guilty or not guilty. The prosecution bears the burden of proof in a criminal trial. Thus, the prosecutor must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant committed the crimes charged. The defendant has a constitutional right to a jury trial in most criminal matters. A jury or judge makes the final determination of guilt or innocence after listening to opening and closing statements, examination and cross-examination of witnesses and jury instructions. If the jury fails to reach a unanimous verdict, the judge may declare a mistrial, and the case will either be dismissed or a new jury will be chosen. If a judge or jury finds the defendant guilty, the court will sentence the defendant.

4 0
3 years ago
What is the triangular trade?
monitta
Triangular trade or triangle trade is a historical term indicating trade among three ports or regions.
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did fighting in the civil war change the lives of Texas soldiers (2points)
    12·1 answer
  • What does “walk blamelessly” mean in the Bible??
    11·2 answers
  • Why might the Roman Republic have seen Carthage as a threat?
    7·1 answer
  • What percent of Ukrainians think of themselves as Russians? And does Russia have an justification for taking the territory of an
    9·1 answer
  • What was a characteristic of American companies in the 1920s?
    10·1 answer
  • Choose the word or phrase that best completes each sentence about the impact of early Chinese innovations.
    8·1 answer
  • How did England's power struggles between the Catholic Church and the state (King HenryII) lead to the Crusades in the Holy Land
    11·1 answer
  • What does "Civil Disobedience" suggest about the jailer’s opinion of Thoreau's arrest for tax evasion? Tax evasion was not a ser
    10·1 answer
  • Should the Qing be seen as foreign rulers over China?
    15·1 answer
  • What do the figures indicate about child labor during this part of the Industrial Revolution?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!