Answer:
No, they would not have been able to legalize recreational marihuana.
Explanation:
This is because, in an unitary system, administrative divisions like Georgia or Colorado have very few powers, and certainly, they do not have any legislative powers.
All legislation emerges from the central government in an unitary system, and this means that if the U.S. was an unitary system, the law to legalize recreational marihuana would have to come, exclusively, from the U.S. Congress.
Unless the U.S. Congress legalized marihuana nationwide, no state would be allowed to do so under an unitary system. it would continue to be prohibited.
Answer:
The answer is D). To defend Indigenous from US expansion
Explanation:
B... The differences between federal and state courts are defined mainly by jurisdiction. ... The only cases state courts are not allowed to hear are lawsuits against the United States and those involving certain specific federal laws: criminal, antitrust, bankruptcy, patent, copyright, and some maritime cases.
Answer:
The correct answer is all of the above.
Explanation:
The progressives of the early 20th century wanted among other things:
- To increase democracy - they promoted women's suffrage out of a religious motivation. They thought that women would vote purely on a moral basis.
- To attain social justice - the progressives were worried about corruption, poverty, and malnutrition. They impulsed the creation of the FDA, and sought the removal from office of corrupted officials who they thought, caused poverty by being inefficient and committing crimes such as embezzlement.
- Improve the negative effects of industrialization and urbanization - the progressives were worried about infraestructure, public sanitation, water supply, among other issues that were problematic in cities in the early 20th century.
