The question is incomplete, so the complete question is as follows:
What is an example of a reason why historical interpretations may change over time?
A. Archeologists may uncover new climate evidence.
B. Political scientists discover a new method of scientific research.
C. Economists may learn more about how ancient governments operated.
D. New X-ray technology proves that previous medical conclusions were incorrect.
Answer:
A). Archeologists may uncover new climate evidence.
Explanation:
The Archeologists works to reveal several historical interpretations on thebasis of facts gathered from primary sources of evidence.
The example that [roves chnaging interpretation over time by archeologists is that they may uncover new climate evidence which can change the earlier facts and can reveal several new things. Archeologists can change tehir views whenever they will find some new and more strong evidences.
Hence, the correct option is "A".
Answer:
environment care to save the earth
Answer:
<em>The correct option between all the options that are given is </em><em>option B</em><em> which tells about mass destruction’s weapon’s involvement.
</em>
Explanation:
It was noted by US and UK that then Iraqi president Saddam Hussein was prepared for Weapons of mass destruction and although Iraqi were given serious chances to disarm and comply with all obligations.
The weapons they had was no improvement in the situation which led to Iraq facing the consequences.
I think it's C i hope I help