So in this case, you would need to find the present value (PV) of the monthly payments. With the information given, you would have a PV= 195,413.08, which is less than the lump sum payment. In this case, you would take the 1 time payment.
Another way to look at this is to calculate the future value (FV) of both payouts. For the lump sum payment, you would assume the same interest rate (6%) and at the end of the same 20 years period, your investment would be worth 662,040.90 while the monthly payment option would be worth 646,857.25
I believe the answer is:
(B)radio announcer
(D)graphic designer
It is very common for Radio announcer to invite and interview guests and They are basically interacting with clients and fulfilled the client's wish regarding how their products need to be advertised.
Graphis designer, also require constant interaction with the customers in order to know whether the desing that is made by the designer is suitable with the image that the customers have in mind.
Answer:
I think the answer is e. Because you the variable that if everyone stands up you cant see is omitted.
Answer:
D) Both the landowner and the attorney.
Explanation:
The bank will succeed in obtaining a judgement against both the former landowner and the attorney. The bank can sue either of them or both of them, but it can only collect the $5,000 once.
- When the attorney assumed the mortgage, he expressly promised to pay it. The lender becomes a third party beneficiary of the attorney's promise to pay and can sue him if the mortgage isn't paid.
- The former landowner became secondarily liable to the lender in case the attorney didn't pay.
