In "thinking like an economist," the section "the role of economic theory" states that many economists believe that useful insights into our behavior can be gained by assuming that we act as if governed by the rules of rational decision-making.
It is possible to define rational decision-making as a decision-making process that incorporates reasoning at every stage. It is founded on the use of impartial knowledge. The first step in making a reasonable decision is to identify the issue that needs to be resolved, followed by the collection of all relevant data.
The next step is to examine every outcome that might result from each potential solution. The decision-making process that follows comprises weighing all viable options and selecting the best one based on reasoning.
Rational decision-making examples include:
● A student chooses what to study in his post-secondary education.
● A commercial choice regarding what to buy for the company.
To know more about decision-making refer to:
brainly.com/question/1249089
#SPJ4
This is a true fact, what is the question though?
Answer:
Principal-agent.
Explanation:
This problem comes to play when one has to make decisions on behalf of another person.
The principal-agent problem is a conflict in priorities between a person or group and the representative authorized to act on their behalf. An agent may act in a way that is contrary to the best interests of the principal.
It can occur in any situation in which the ownership of an asset, or a principal, delegates direct control over that asset to another party, or agent.
Answer:
The answer about A static budget would be
Explanation:
A static budget is a type of budget that incorporates anticipated values on inputs and products that are conceived before the period in question begins. When compared to the actual results that are received after the fact, the static budget figures are often very different from the actual results.
The static budget is intended to be fixed and unchanged throughout the period, regardless of fluctuations that may affect the results.
For example, under a static budget a company would establish an anticipated expense, say $ 30,000 for a marketing campaign, for the duration of the period. It is then up to the managers to adhere to that budget, regardless of how the cost of generating that campaign really stays during the period.
This type of budgeting is limited by the ability of an organization to accurately forecast what its needs are, how much it will spend to meet them and what its operating income will be during the period. Static budgets can be more effective for organizations that have highly predictable sales and costs, and for shorter periods of time.
For example, if a company sees the same costs in materials, profits, labor, advertising and production month after month to maintain its operations and there is no expectation of change, a static budget may be adequate for its needs.
B or D I believe I remember the question but it’s one of those 2
