Answer:
all hurricane katrina victims are having experiences similar to his
Explanation:
Zeitoun is saying that he and the victims of Hurricane Katrina suffered several storms. He said this, because after the hurricane, zeitoun who is a Syrian American was aware that there were island survivors near his home, so he rescued an old aluminum boat in the garage and walked around the neighborhood, helping those that he found. The voluntary Round becomes a routine, and for a week zeitoun has transformed the small vessel into an extension of official support to the victims of the disaster, until the intervention of military and paramilitary troops, including Blackwater mercenary agents and thousands of uniformed men armed up to his teeth, abruptly interrupted Zeitoun's activities. He was arrested in a place that very much resembles the gloomy Guantanamo, without any justification or even the right to make a phone call to his wife.
I believe the correct answer is C.
Answer:
I would say c because that is the only thing that would make cause and effect for the answers your welcome plz give brainliest
Explanation:
your welcome
Answer:
The right answer is "People now lived all around the world and had to learn to use animal skins for clothes and make canoes for travel.
"
Explanation:
The Mesolithic era is also known as the Middle Stone Age, it can be dated approximately between 10000 to 8000 BC. The cultures of this period developed varied local adaptations to special environments. Mesolithic populations were often forced to become migrating hunters and settle in rock shelters and the development of agriculture of this period of time helped the rise of enduring settlements. Some Mesolithic people sustained the hunting, while others trained the early stages of domestication as well. Mesolithic tools were usually compound devices manmade with small fragmented stone tools called microliths.
Answer:
The correct answer is C. A judge could throw out the teen's confession unless the officer complies with the ruling in Miranda v. Arizona.
Explanation:
Miranda v. Arizona is a ruling of the United States Supreme Court from 1966. The case established the current practice whereby a suspect is required to read his or her rights (the so-called Miranda rights) without exception, which state the right to before a preliminary investigation of the suspect has begun.
That was the decision in Ernesto Miranda's trial. Miranda was arrested on suspicion of kidnapping and sexual assault of an 18-year-old girl on prima facie evidence. After two hours of questioning, Miranda signed the confession. However, he had never been informed of the possibility of meeting a legal adviser or of being silent, and that his confession could not be used against him. During the trial, Miranda's attorney, Alvin Moore, argued that confession would therefore not apply in court. Moore's objection was rejected and Miranda was sentenced to a lengthy prison sentence. The Arizona Supreme Court also upheld the ruling.
The United States Supreme Court, by a vote of 5 to 4, ruled that, due to the Fifth and Sixth Amendment to the Constitution, no confession would be valid unless the suspect was informed of his rights. The Fifth Amendment states that no one can be compelled to testify against himself and the Sixth Addendum secures access to a lawyer. Ernesto Miranda's judgment was overturned, but he was later sentenced to prison for the same case, based on other evidence.
