A questionnaire item, distributed to a random sample of adults, reading "Are you not in support of nationalized health care", with a yes or no possible response, would violate the concept of "Avoid negative items."
Option d
<u>
Explanation:
</u>
While doing a research study the researcher has to formulate the questionnaire according to the field of research. In this type of questionnaire based data research, one has to give at most importance to the target audience whom the research is meant for.
To get better data from target group on has to develop a questionnaire which avoids the negative items because the target group should not be confused while giving their opinion.
So, before preparing a questionnaire one has to clearly study and understand the nature of group and their attitude towards the particular segment of research to avoid negative items.
This is TRUE!
That way all battles and all people who died could be commemorated equally. Additionally, it was a good time, because flowers for decoration were more available at the time.
Hi!
There are C. 100 US Senators.
A persuasive message is the central message that intrigues, informs, convinces, or calls to action. Persuasive messages are often discussed in phrases of cause versus emotion. Every message has elements of ethos, or credibility; pathos, or passion and enthusiasm; and logos, or common sense and reason.
<h3>When a person is making a persuasive argument?</h3>
It tries to persuade a reader to adopt a certain point of view or to take a precise action. The argument ought to constantly use sound reasoning and strong evidence with the aid of mentioning facts, giving logical reasons, using examples, and quoting experts.
Central Route to Persuasion
When discussing the Elaboration Likelihood Model, we use the term 'elaborate' to mean 'to assume elaborately about something. ' The central route to persuasion is when humans complicated on a persuasive argument, listening cautiously and questioning about the common sense at the back of the message.
Learn more about persuasion here:
<h3>
brainly.com/question/1790640</h3><h3 /><h3>#SPJ4</h3>
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
I am going to take into consideration the 1st. Amendment to the United States Constitution.
It is true that the federal government must often balance protecting individual liberties and providing for order and security. We have seen how, at times, priority is given to one over the other, depending on the circumstances.
However, according to my thinking and belief systems, the federal government should always place more emphasis on protecting individual liberties. Just when the exceptional case is necessary, then the federal government must provide for order and security.
As stated in the 1st. Amendment, citizens must always have their freedom of speech and freely express what they believe is right; this includes reasonable critics of the economic and political systems, as well as to highlight positive attributes too.
Respecting the differences has always been a trademark for true democracies.
It is understandable that in times of conflict, as was the case of WWI and WWII, the government has put restrictions on certain liberties.
Some would say that the September 11 attacks justify the creation of the type of surveillance the government placed on the citizens, but that is when a fine line was crossed between protection and "espionage" without the consent of the citizens.
