Answer:
It is aligned with values, challenging objectivity.
Explanation:
Action research is highly controversial among more traditional social scientist because they believe that action research is not channel or tailored to take into consideration the limitations of the actual scenario or situation. They also believe that action research adheres to an ideal-type model, which is not the case in real life. Finally, this model is controversial because social scientists believe that it is simply aligned with values and challenges objectivity.
The correct answer is false. I just took the test and got this right.
I hoped this helped : )
Answer:
B. applying most Bill of Rights protections to state governments.
Explanation:
Incorporation, according to United States law is simply the way sections of the Bill of Rights are applied to state level instead of only federal level.
Before the 20th Century, most notably in 1833, the Supreme Court ruled that the Bill of Rights applied only to federal legal and not at state level. Also in 1876, the Supreme Court also ruled that the First and Second Amendment didn't apply to the state level.
However, from the early 1900s, there were decisions taken by the Supreme Court which interpreted that the Fourteenth Amendment was to incorporate many parts of the Bill of Rights and for the first time, it was applicable to state governments.
Answer:
D. Predictive validity
Explanation:
Predictive validity is one approach of criterion validity that predicts individual performance on some measure scores administered at a later date. The judgement of being conscientious came from an accumulated observation of the individual attendance over time which clearly illustrate predictive validity.
It is important to start practicing alternatives to non-renewable resources because we are running out very quickly and they will not be around forever. Hope this helps :)<span />
