1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Maru [420]
3 years ago
9

Explain why freedom of speech is important for the media

History
2 answers:
lianna [129]3 years ago
6 0
Freedom of speech is important for the media because their is no government restrictions on speech because of the 1st amendment.  Some countries like china and north Korea control what the press tell the people.  But in the united states we have the right to say whatever it is we what. 
alekssr [168]3 years ago
4 0
<span>Freedom of speech is a bellweather: how any society tolerates those with minority, disfavored, or even obnoxious views will often speak to its performance on human rights more generally.  In international law, access to information and free expression are two sides of the same coin, and both have found tremendous accelerators in the Internet and other forms of digital communication.  At the same time, efforts to control speech and information are also accelerating, by both governments and private actors in the form of censorship, restrictions on access, and violent acts directed against those whose views or queries are seen as somehow dangerous or wrong. From our earliest days, when we were called The Fund for Free Expression, we have fought all forms of repression of speech, in all media, around the globe.</span>
You might be interested in
Write the Declaration of Independence in your own words
ioda

The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America, When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the Legislative powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers.He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance. I can't put the whole thing i have to keep it under 5000 charaters.

7 0
3 years ago
Was delaware situation better under the articles of confederation
tatuchka [14]

Answer:

YES

Delaware supported the single legislative chamber and one-vote-per-state procedures specified by the Articles. But its representatives simultaneously bemoaned the lack of regulated interstate commerce and financial instability among other shortcomings.

Also:On December 7, 1787, Delaware was the first state to vote in favor of, or ratify, it. New Hampshire became the ninth state to accept the Constitution on June 21, 1788, which officially ended government under the Articles of Confederation.

Explanation:

~Hope this helps~

3 0
3 years ago
Bsisfb,tbsfawt5yovLBWA5YO,apamgtbsfatlstfu
Dmitrij [34]

Answer:

yes.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Based on the chart, what can you conclude about how Texas Medical Center has affected Houston’s economy over time?A)It has contr
Gwar [14]
Yup that’s right z’n:)
H ,hm7;’my gngngntnybtbtn
3 0
3 years ago
Africans and Native Americans during the colonial period
Wewaii [24]
Well because of what research says I believe that ur answer might be a

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Describe the debate pertaining to tariffs during the Gilded Age
    9·1 answer
  • Which statement describes the U.S. reaction to the "final solution?"
    14·1 answer
  • When did the cold war end?
    9·2 answers
  • Which of the following is a way farmers attempted to increase the price of agricultural products during the Great Depression?
    9·1 answer
  • Some apartments of the early 1900s were known as “dumbbell tenements” because they had
    8·1 answer
  • Which two factors would play an important role in the rise of Nazism and the coming of World War II
    9·1 answer
  • In what time period did the Indian class system begin to change?
    13·1 answer
  • Based on what you have read, what was Dix's
    13·2 answers
  • Who was William A Alcott?
    9·2 answers
  • What is special about the Santorini volcano?
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!