Answer:
it will be option C. bats
<span>US gained territory in the Pacific Ocean.
The Spanish-American War is the beginning of the imperial era in US history gaining their first territories from the war.
The US gained Puerto Rico, Guam, and the Philippines from the Spanish-American War and soon after completed the annexation of Hawaii. With colonies in the Pacific and trade connections growing in Asia, the US needed a quick way to move resources and ships from the East coast to these new areas. The canal through Panama made the naval commute shorter and faster as well as safer.</span><span />
The answer is the Roman senators were elected every 6 years. hope that helped
The Supreme Court’s ruling in the civil rights cases of 1883 led to D. the rise of segregation laws in the south.
<h3>What were the segregation laws in the south called?</h3>
The segregation laws in the south that arose as a result of the consolidation of the Supreme Court's civil rights cases of 1883 were called Jim Crow laws.
The Jim Crow laws ensured that racial segregation thrived in the United States until the 1960s when the Civil Rights Act was passed.
Thus, the Supreme Court’s ruling in the civil rights cases of 1883 led to D. the rise of segregation laws in the south.
Learn more about racial segregation in the United States at brainly.com/question/27227571
#SPJ1
Answer:
A. limit free speech.
Explanation:
The first amendment of United States constitution protect the citizens' ability for "Free speech". This law was intended to give the citizens with the power to protest the government. But many people interpret it as the ability to say whatever they want to other people without consequences.
The "clear and present danger' test was devised by the Supreme Court. The consist of standards that law enforcement can follow to differentiate "Free speech" and assault.
As a general rule, If the speech that given by a person either threatening the welfare of individuals, disrupt public order, or agitating other individuals to be a target for attack, that speech would no longer be protected by the 1st amendment.
