This is the kind of concept a utilitarian would agree on. If the result is positive for a large group of people, we should seriously consider doing it.
However, I would like to comment on this concept. In my opinion (and that's what you're asking for) there are situations in which the ends don't justify the means. You can e.g. think about mass-bombings to fight against terrorism. However, the possibility exists that innocent people will be hit, and will die. Therefore, the end don't always justify the means (in my opinion).
Answer:
March 4, 1829. Jackson Inaugurated.
April 13, 1830. Tensions between Jackson and Calhoun.
May 26, 1830. Indian Removal Act.
May 27, 1830. Jackson vetoes Maysville Road bill.
April 1, 1831. Peggy Eaton Affair.
July 4, 1831. French spoliation claims.
July 10, 1832. Jackson opposes Second Bank of the United States.
Indira's ascent was backed by her charismatic appeal among the masses that was aided by her government's near-radical leftward turns.
Approved July 2, 1890<span>, The </span>Sherman Anti-Trust Act<span> was the first Federal </span>act<span> that outlawed monopolistic business practices. The </span>Sherman Antitrust Act<span> of </span>1890<span> was the first measure </span>passed<span> by the U.S. Congress to prohibit trusts</span>
