<h2><u><em>Me das mas información?</em></u></h2>
This was because the rich owners of the factories and other places of work has a lot of sway in the government, while the people whom they hired were often very young (child labor was completely unregulated) and virtually none of the workers had an education. This coupled with harsh punishments for disobedience and failing to meet quota meant many lived in fear of their superiors. All of these factors came together to result in few wanting to try and rest out of fear of harsh punishment or simply getting replaced by one of the thousands of desperate people looking for work, that and with nobody knowing how to read or write rallies were difficult to pull together without passing through word of mouth, if you've ever played telephone then you know how reliable that is. There's the shortest answer I could come up with. I hope this helps.
Answer:
mussolini's fascism was less about race but more about the nationality of the state and the nation above all.
nazism was more about the germanic race is what creates a nation.
Italy wasn't anti semtic until the germans had a lot of influence. Italy is ultra nationalism.
nazism is ultra germanic race aryans, the germans saw nordic countries as brothers. so nazism is way more racist and is basically all about race and its national socialism.
Justinian was an <span>autocrat</span> which is when a monarch is the sole ruler of his empire and his complete authority.
Answer:
Depends on how you look at it.
Explanation:
Nixon opening up relations with communist countries was very good in terms of opening trade with low wage labor economies like china which represented a big economic success for both America and China. Him opening up relations improved Americas standing with many nations of the world including the soviets leading to reduction of nuclear arms in the future, these are positive aspects to it. The negative aspect is that mutual benefit also helps communist adversaries of America, opening up liberal trade with china failed to bring democracy to China, in fact it only led to higher levels of authoritarianism and shady economic practices like currency manipulation which hurts American currency exchange value. Its complicated, i would personally say it was a good idea but with a few major drawbacks geopolitically.