Answer:
B net income is overstated, assets are overstated, and stockholders' equity is overstated
Explanation:
The movement in the balance of inventory at the start and end of a period is as a result of sales and purchases. While sales reduces the balance in inventory, purchases increases the balance. This may be expressed mathematically as
Opening balance + purchases - cost of goods sold = closing balance
Hence, where ending inventory balance is overstated, cost of goods sold is understated. When cost of goods sold is understated, gross and net incomes are overstated. Hence owner's equity is overstated and asset overstated.
Answer: This case is an example of <em><u>core competencies that further have turned into core rigidities.</u></em>
In this particular case , the store was capable of catering to the demands of the market. Thus providing excellent service and technical advice.
But with the dawn of an era, now the store is earning lower-than-average returns. Also this is to be pondered upon that in current era only few potential customers are able to appreciate the premium quality of the fabrics.
Answer:
D) net profit before taxes; total assets invested
Explanation:
The formula to compute the return on investment is shown below:
Return on investment = Operating Income ÷ Total assets invested
It shows a relationship between the pre taxes operating income and the total assets investment
It checks that investment which is invested yields high returns or not. If it generates high returns that it will gain to the company else the company will suffered the losses.
Answer:
C. Beneficial
Explanation:
As Qing was upset about meeting with the lawyers where they could see risks everywhere and were very good at arguing their position. She strongly believed in her proposal. But after a long meeting, Qing and the lawyers worked out new contract language addressing each risk that they identified. In the end, the conflict was beneficial because both parties reached to some productive conclusion at the end and it was win-win situation for both parties. This conflict encouraged both parties in coming up with a solution on which both partied happily agreed as well and hence this conflict was proved fruitful.
The Johnson's can't sue the driver in the Federal Court because the Johnson's live in the same state (since the driver lives near the Johnson's in the same time) and the damages ($5,000.00) are too small.
