Loyalty to WHICH governing model was displaced by ideas advanced in the Declaration of Independence and the U.S Constitution?

History

2 answers:

stealth61 [152]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

C) the monarchy, or rule by divine right of a king

Explanation:

Simora [160]3 years ago

6 0

The correct answer is C.

The Declaration of Independence was signed in 1776, after the American Revolution, and stated that the Thriteen American Colonies were no longer under British rule, and would now be sovereign states.

The U.S Constitution was adopted in the same year, establishing a federal government made up of three branches: the the legislative, the executive, and the judicial.

These two displaced the monarchic system that was instated in America at that time in favour of a federal government in which citizens did not have to answer to a king, but to a representative chosen by the mayority.

You might be interested in

Mark three elements that describe the following view concerning treatment of the central powers especially Germany after the war

Brut [27]

<span>disarming the countries a just peace prevent future hostilities</span>

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

(03.03 MC)

tiny-mole [99]

I think it’s only the states could raise taxes

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Who can vote in Saudi Arabia? who do they vote for?

arsen [322]

You have to be a male that is 21 or older.

6 0

3 years ago

Why did Britian pass the Coercive Acts? What group was affected?

RSB [31]

Answer:

Punishment. Massachussetts Colonists/Colonists in America.

Explanation:

The Bristist Parliment passed a series of laws in 1774, after the Boston Tea Party. This was also know as the intolerable acts. They passed these laws to punish the colonists for the Boston Tea Party.

The five Intolerable Acts were:

Boston Port Act.
Administration of Justice Act.
Massachusetts Government Act.
Quartering Act.
Quebec Act.

I hope this helps!

8 0

3 years ago

Why was the pardon of Nixon controversial

Sonja [21]

When Gerald Ford issued Proclamation 4311 (the document in which gave Richard Nixon full and unconditional pardon), he was excused from any crimes he may commit against the United States while president. This was controversial because there was nothing stopping Nixon from committing treason against the United States. People believe the law should apply to everybody equally no matter what the standards nor what position/title you hold. The other side of the argument is that because he's the President of the United States and holds all this power, he's "untouchable" in a sense, and/or doesn't deserve to be held by the same law that every other citizen is under.

7 0

3 years ago