Answer: Because each state was looking out for its personal interests in regard to representation in Congress.
Details:
The Great Compromise and the Three-Fifths Compromise both focused on the representation of states in Congress. Both of these compromises were devised during the United States Constitutional Convention in 1787.
- The Great Compromise resolved a dispute between small population states and large population states. The large population states wanted representation in Congress to be based on a state's population size. The smaller states feared this would lead to unchecked dominance by the big states; they wanted all states to receive the same amount of representation. The Great Compromise created a bicameral (two-chamber) legislature. Representation in the House of Representatives would be based on population. In the Senate, all states would have the same amount of representation, by two Senators.
- The Three-Fifths Compromise was a way of accounting (somewhat) for the population of slaves in states that permitted slavery. For taxation and representation purposes, the question was whether slaves should count in the population figures. (They were not considered voting citizens at that time.) The Three-Fifths Compromise said that three out of every five slaves could be counted when determining a state's population size for determining how many seats that state would receive in the House of Representatives.
I Believe The Answer Is C. The Environment
Answer:
Isolated from law reach
Explanation:
Most western states grew on the promise of mining, people moved by the hundreds of thousands and the U.S did not have the infrastructure at the time. in some places they might have not been a sheriff for hundreds of miles thus most people did not belive that there was nearly any consequences for their actions which caused unpredictable and usually bad behavior
Yes, the statement is true.
Conflict erupted within and between the colonial territories of North America and American Indians as a result of different European nations competing for the same resources.
- As the French, Dutch, British, and Spanish colonies allied with, traded with, and armed American Indian groups, conflicts in Europe migrated to North America, resulting in ongoing political instability.
- Teachers have the liberty to utilize examples such as the following: Chickasaw and Beaver Wars
- As European nations fought it out for dominance in North America, their colonies concentrated on securing fresh labor as well as on manufacturing and purchasing goods that were highly prized in Europe.
- Conflicts between the social and economic values of Europeans and American Indians led to changes in both societies.
To learn more about European Colonization visit the link:
brainly.com/question/4805482?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ4
