1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Gnoma [55]
3 years ago
6

how did the U.S government 's approach to the military during the great depression differ from that of germany's Nazi government

?
History
1 answer:
pashok25 [27]3 years ago
4 0
U.s government didnt kill people but just as bad they let children starve to dead because people unemployed couldn't pay back loans or get job because everything closing down.
You might be interested in
How did Feudalism impact The roman Catholic Church
Pachacha [2.7K]

Answer:

Feudalism impacted the roman catholic church because they had diffrent beleifre

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Which of the following statements best describes French settlers' treatment of Native Americans? A. French settlers ignored the
xxMikexx [17]
The statement that best describes French settlers' treatment of Native Americans would be that "A. French settlers ignored the local native population
<span>unless they interfered with the fur trade," since the French had relatively good relations with the Natives compared to the Spanish the British. </span>
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
I NEED HELP PLEASE !!!!!
Varvara68 [4.7K]
South of Egypt I think I just looked at the map
4 0
3 years ago
What did different groups of Reagan supporters agree on during the 1980 election?
Ivanshal [37]
<span>a forceful foreign policy
</span>
Reagan inherited the cold war at a time that the detente had crashed following Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, and an ongoing Iranian hostage crisis. the country felt that his predecessor had been very soft in the international arena especially on soviet union,and middle east countries.
<span /><span />
7 0
3 years ago
In a least 150 words answer the following question. Which of the three economic systems (market, planned, and mixed) do you beli
ycow [4]
Scarcity is the fundamental challenge that all individuals and nations must confront. Everyone faces some limitations, so we all have to make choices where we limit or allow ourselves to something.

Economists generally recognize four types of economic systems traditional, traditional, command, market and mixed.

A traditional economic system is shaped by tradition. The work that people do, the goods and services they provide, how they exchange resources… all tend to follow a pattern. The traditional system is bad at addressing scarcity because scarcity is formed off of new requirements people have through the ages and a traditional system would not evolve just as our requirements would.

In a planned economy, the government controls the economy. The state decides how to use and distribute resources. The government regulates prices and wages; it may even determine what sorts of work individuals do.
Socialism is a prime example of a planned economy. Socialism does not work because it is not consistent with the fundamental principles of human behavior. The failure of socialism in countries around the world can be traced to one critical defect: it is a system that ignores incentives.

Market economies allow all economic decisions to be made by individuals. The unrestrained interactions between individuals and companies in the marketplace determine what happens to all the good and resources.Individuals choose how to invest their personal resources and individuals decide what to consume. Within a pure market economy,  the government is entirely absent from economic affairs.

A mixed economic system combines elements of the market and command economy. Many economic decisions are made in the market by individuals. But the government also plays a role in the allocation and distribution of resources.

If scarcity is looked at on a macro level, the best economic system is mixed because it allows the government to also plays a role in the allocation and distribution of resources, while the individuals still stay happy because they have some control. The only problem is the eternal question of what the right mix between the public and private sectors of the economy should be.

There is no point to look at it on a micro level because almost no country is small enough to be considered on that level.









7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • By ruling in James McCulloch’s favor in McCulloch v. Maryland, the Supreme Court agreed that
    12·2 answers
  • Which of the following is true of the Korean conflict? Select all that apply:
    15·1 answer
  • Which abolitionist tried to seize a federal armory in 1859 on behalf of his cause?
    14·1 answer
  • The United States experienced major foreign policy issues in the late 1800s with all of the following EXCEPT
    7·2 answers
  • Who was the 1st president of USA?
    6·2 answers
  • What new chinese dynasty pushed the mongols out of china and began a new policy of expansionism?
    8·1 answer
  • 1. What was the first thing Texas needed upon gaining independence? _______________________________________ 2. Sam Houston was e
    5·2 answers
  • This particular founding father only served 2 terms and did not want to be
    9·2 answers
  • What made World War I a Total War? What was the effect on Society ?
    7·1 answer
  • Describe the importance of art and architecture in the Renaissance time period.
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!