The real reason for maintaining armies is the same reason why some men buy expensive sports cars... overcompensating.
Seriously, think of armies as insurance. Even if it's small, amateurish, and under-funded, it's likely to give potential bullies a little pause. (Of course, a big country like Iraq can sweep up a little country like Kuwait in no time flat, as we all know).
Part of the answer is social/ economic/ political inertia. The military is part of the playground for the elite and privileged. (I use the word playground as in "fork over your lunch money, weakling.") Who wants to get rid of their army just to balance the budget? I sure haven´t seen "fire soldier-boys" on any IMF or World Bank wish lists
A lot of countries, fragile democracies, say, find armies to be an effective tool to use on internal "problems." In a pinch, a loyal military can keep your nation away from chaos. On the other hand, they work equally well to keep dictators in power.
<span>Many countries do get a lot more mileage out of their armies than Iceland or Costa Rica could possibly get. Obviously, a lot of African countries find them pretty handy.
</span>
Also, keep this quote in mind
<span>"It takes two countries to maintain peace and only one to make war"</span>
Answer: Cheerfulness, positive attitude
Explanation:
Customer service is part of the backbone of business. How customers are treated would determine how long the business would last, when customers are not treated well, there won't be a growth regarding the business, employees would need this in mind considering the various kinds of clients they would come across and it's very obvious they won't be the same, a lot of positive mindedness and cheerfulness is required, this is what is required a lot for Susan's job
Answer is Inclusion
Explanation: Inclusion is actually ensuring the establishment of a work environment where every employee is treated fairly and valued equally, have equal access to work opportunities and resources, and is encouraged to be optimally productive to the organization.
Inclusion should not be confused with Diversity. Though closely related and a tandem of each other, Inclusion has a different concept to diversity. Diversity has to do with employing a diverse group or team of people in traits and characteristics (such as race, color, age, gender, disability, marital status, e.t.c) which makes them unique. Inclusion on the other hand has to do with organizational behavior and ethics to ensure every employee (no matter their diversity) is fairly treated and has equal access to opportunities and resources.
Answer:
government by the people; a form of government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised directly by them or by their elected agents under a free electoral system.
Explanation:
