1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
nalin [4]
3 years ago
5

According to Kant's Deontology, the categorical imperative is a tool that measures our desires and feelings, in order to asses w

hether or not our action will result in circumstances that coincide with the moral law. True or false?
Social Studies
1 answer:
julia-pushkina [17]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

False

Explanation:

False statement.

Kant claims that desires and feelings are contingent. Morality needs to be based in necessity.The categorical imperative is a device that tests our interests and emotions to determine whether our behavior follows the moral law or not. It is important to base morality on necessity. Kant insists that a conceptual necessity is the ultimate reason / justification for any moral action.

You might be interested in
Write an essay on Marx’s and Weber’s approaches to social stratification. In a paragraph for each theory, elaborate on the key p
Serhud [2]

Answer:

Karl Marx and Max Weber were two German sociologists who wrote extensively about social stratification in modern capitalist societies. However, their methods and conclusions were very different. Marx saw class struggle as the most important factor, while Weber rejected Marx's ideas and had a more nuanced approach to social stratification.

Explanation:

For Karl Marx, social stratification was a consequence of the division of society in social classes. These classes are divided by their relationship to the means of production. In other words, by the place they occupy in the economy. Marx argued that there are two main classes: the bourgeoisie, which sits above the rest of society because they own the means of production, and the proletariat, who own no means of production and must sell their labour power to the bourgeoisie in order to make a living. In short, whether one owns or not the material means of life is the most important factor in social stratification.

Max Weber, on the other hand, considered Marx's explanation lacking. He considered that social stratification went beyond who owned the means of production, and considered that there are three dimensions to social class which determine one's place in society: power, which means how much one is able to influence the behaviour of others; economic inequality, which refers to how much wealth one owns with respect to others; and social status, which is a more diffuse understanding of how one's own worth is perceived by others. Weber considered that these three dimensions together better explained social stratification than relations of production alone.

Given what has been said, we can note two key differences between Marx and Weber. Marx was a materialist philosopher, in the sense that for him material differences were the primary factor, while social and psychological factors were determined by the material factor. For Weber, the material factor was only one of many, and certainly not the most important. This leads to the second difference. Marx considered that class struggle, the conflict between the owning class and the working classes, was the driving force of history. Weber on the other hand, saw class struggle as more diluted and nowere as crucial and important as Marx saw it.

5 0
3 years ago
Which statements best describe the camp david accords? check all that apply. they ended all arab-israeli conflicts in the middle
alisha [4.7K]

Answer:

- They were the first peace agreement for Israel in the Middle East.

- They showed that Arabs and Israelis could negotiate in good faith.

- They showed that the US could play an important role in negotiations.

Explanation:

I think

6 0
3 years ago
Why do the practices of places like walmart and target help keep people in poverty?
kipiarov [429]

Answer:

because  it's good to do good deeds for others ,gratitude,humanity ,

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Similarity in personality is less of a contributor to conflict in late adulthood than it is in midlife.
Murljashka [212]
The answer is true..



3 0
2 years ago
He cuneiform system of writing used symbols that represented ______________.
ikadub [295]

Answer:

Sumerian cuneiform is the earliest known writing system. Its origins can be traced back to about 8,000 BC and it developed from the pictographs and other symbols used to represent trade goods and livestock on clay tablets. Originally the Sumerians made small tokens out of clay to represent the items.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which Southwest Asian country could be described as an autocracy?
    9·1 answer
  • Children who are raised without human interaction, or with a minimum of human contact, are referred to as ________ children
    15·1 answer
  • Please give examples of compitition for food in Ice Age 2 The Meltdown
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the original states were not "landed"
    5·1 answer
  • True or False:<br> States decide most of the qualifications for running for president?
    8·1 answer
  • In criminal procedure, the initial appearance: a. is where a plea is entered. b. follows the grand jury proceedings. c. is the p
    10·1 answer
  • All of these are features of prices, except _______.
    7·2 answers
  • evaluate to what extent the following institutions have supported communities affected by human rights violations on community​
    12·1 answer
  • Anong uri ng kontemporaryong isyu ang sa tingin mo ay dapat pagtuonan ng pansin ng ating pamahalaan? Bakit?
    9·1 answer
  • Read from the letter written by indentured servant Richard Frethorne to his parents.
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!