Answer: A. designating an anti-charity should be more effective because loss aversion will provide additional motivation
.
Options:
A. designating an anti-charity should be more effective because loss
aversion will provide additional motivation
B. designating a charity should be more effective because it avoids all potential for loss
C. it shouldn’t matter whether one designates a charity or anti-charity
D. self-interest biases generally keep people from choosing the anti-charity
Explanation:
The study of behavioral Economics shows that people are more driven by the loss of fear than the hope of gain. This is known as loss aversion. In commitment contracts where penalty money is promised to a charity or an anti-charity if the goal is not achieved, those who promise their money to an anti-charity tend to achieve their goals more. The same also applies when comparing this group and those who do not have to forego anything if they do not meet their target.
This is because giving to a charity will still seem beneficial while losing the money to an anti-charity will seem like a total loss.
Spontaneous recovery means the reappearance of a previous extinguished response. For instance, Jon is scared of dogs because he thinks they look angry. After a long treatment, he finally gets used to play with the dogs. He is no longer afraid of dogs. However, one day he saw a dog walking towards him, he suddenly started to fear again. His fear was extinguished after the treatment, but he suddenly recovered that response again. This is more of an one time event.
The correct answer is personality traits
Personality traits are the characteristics that allow us to create an exhaustive description of the person, therefore, they allow us to distinguish one person from another. These traits make people act more or less in accordance with them, that is, a person with a certain personality trait, must act in a manner consistent with that trait.
It is very important to take into account that personality traits do not follow the dichotomous idea of everything or nothing, but that people can have a certain degree of a trait (high, medium, low, very, little). In other words, people show personality traits in different measures.
Greek since i've written in greek before and if you look there will be similarities hm...maybe not
