It looks like the ∩ sign may be missing from the question. If you mean to find A∩C, called the intersection, you're looking for elements that are both in A and C.
{0, 2} qualifies.
Answer:
No, it is not.
Step-by-step explanation:
comparing the two given values, 1.75 and 6, estimating 1.75 for 6 is not reasonable. This is due to the fact that converting 1.75 to the nearest whole number gives 2 which is far away from 6. Since,
6 - 2 = 4
So, estimating 1.75 for 6 would involve a large value of error. Which make it unreasonable. It would have been more reasonable to estimate 1.75 for 2.
Answer:
My best guess will have to be B
Step-by-step explanation:
i remember this question
Answer:
D. -2/3
Step-by-step explanation:
Since it is going down, it is negative
Think of this: Rise/Run
In this case, rise is when you are going up or down the graph
Run is when you are going to the right of the graph
Let's use 2 points (0,3) and (3,1)
Since you are going three points to the right we are going to put 3 in for run
You are going 2 places down, so we are going put -2 in for rise
This gives us -2/3
Another way to do this is (1-3)/(3-0) = -2/3
A counter example would be the number 2.
2 is a prime number, because it only has two factors ( itself and 1)
Yet 2 is also an even number, because it can be exactly divided by two.
So the number 2 proves that not every prime number is odd.
