Answer:
The answer is: b
Explanation:
In long-run equilibrium, the long run aggregate demand curve and aggregate supply curve intersect where the marginal revenue (revenue derived from selling an additional unit) and marginal cost (cost incurred from producing) an additional unit) are equal. In the long-run equilibrium, this intersection occurs at the lowest point of the long-run average total cost curve (curve depicting the average cost per unit of production).
Holding all else constant, short run changes in the economy would not change the potential output levels. The long-run aggregate supply curve would remain fixed at the potential level of output. However, these changes: international tensions, corporate scandals and loss of confidence in policymakers would cause shifts in the aggregate demand curve since demand would be adversely affected.
Consumer confidence is the perspective or outlook that consumers have on the state of the economy. The destabilising factors given in this scenario would raise the levels of uncertainty and perceived risk, reducing the confidence levels of consumers and ultimately resulting in reduced demand. In long-run equilibrium, when demand is reduced, it is indicated by a leftward shift in the aggregate demand curve.
Ignoring some safety regulations in order save $1 Million per day. The amount that those violations end up costing the company is $100 Billion.
<h3>What is safety regulation?</h3>
Safety regulation can be defined as a set of rules and regulation that an employees are mandated to follow so as to prevent work hazard.
Based on the given scenario ignoring the safety regulation so as to save $1 million per day will cost the company $100 Billion.
Which is why companies made it compulsory for employees to follow the saftey standard set so as to ensures that employees work in a safe and conducive environment .
Inconclusion the amount that those violations end up costing the company is $100 Billion.
Learn more about Safety regulation here:brainly.com/question/8430576
So what is the question? This is just a statement.
Answer: <em>Option (B) is correct.</em>
Explanation:
If true, the following will most seriously weakens the argument: There has been an increasing rate in store opening in the central shopping district (CSD) since Colson's have opened discount stores.
Since after Colson's opened, the locations which were vacant became stores in particular discount store which did not spar with Colson's. Now that we have a discount store & department store without discount. Therefore when these stores close while competing with SpendLess, they wont be replaced with regular non-discount stores .
