The answer is C.
hope that helps!
<span>A. To unite all Arab countries under a single Pan-Arab state
After WWII, as western nations were gaining power, many Islamic leaders believed it would be better and they would be strong if all of the Arab states were united. </span>
I'm a fan of historian Michael Wood! One of my favorite items from him was the BBC documentary series, "In the Footsteps of Alexander the Great."
The quote you mention from Wood comes from his historical researches regarding India. (You could also look for his BBC documentary series, "The Story of India.") The "rejection of a whole way of understanding history" was the way that Wood described the actions of Asoka (or Ashoka -- you'll see both spellings). Asoka was ruler from 268 to 232 BC of lands that would later become known as India. Asoka was a great conqueror but also someone who found enlightenment through Buddhism. After conquering the Kalinga region in eastern India, rather than feeling some great rush of pride or accomplishment because of their victory, Asoka felt guilty. So he worked hard to improve the lives of the Kalinga people that he had conquered. This was what Wood was referring to when he said Asoka's attitude/approach "was a rejection of a whole way of understanding history." Conquest was not something to be celebrated triumphantly. Rather, the conquerors had an obligation to those whom they had conquered.
<span>Missouri Compromise is first introduced by Henry Clay and it is a sense of maintaining the power balance between the regions. The correct options would be 1. Admit Missouri as a slave state. 3. Admit Maine as a free state. 5 forbid slavery north of 36o 30' in the Louisiana Purchase.
This compromise led the Americans to form more proper unity between the territories.</span>
