Answer:
d. Eliminate contributions to inefficient non-profit organizations
Explanation:
Other listed options are valuable to the question on strategic philanthropy except that on the need to eliminate contributions to inefficient non-profit organizations. No philanthropist would want to offer support to non-profit organizations that are unproductive and inefficient.
Answer:
D. Logical fallacies are unethical because they use logic to emphasize falsehood.
Explanation:
A logical fallacy is reasoning or error of argument which is logically incorrect and renders the validity of an argument invalid.
There are types of logical fallacies such as Ad Hominem, Straw man, etc.
Logical fallacies are easily identified because they usually lack evidence to support their claim.
When something is said to be unethical, it means that it is morally wrong.
Therefore, the false statement from the list is that logical fallacies are unethical because they use logic to emphasize falsehood.
Answer:
1. <em>If this law of contributory negligence applies to the state, then Ramona will receive no compensation for the damages she sustained. </em>
<em>
</em>2<em>. If this law of comparative negligence applies to this state, then Ramona will get 100% - 20% = 80% of the damages incurred in the accident, from John which will be $80,000</em>
<em />
Explanation:
In contributory negligence, the defense completely bars plaintiffs from any recovery if they contribute to their own injury through their own negligence.
<em>If this law of contributory negligence applies to the state, then Ramona will receive no compensation for the damages she sustained. </em>
<em>
</em>
In comparative negligence, the plaintiff's damages is award by the percentage of fault that the fact-finder assigns to the plaintiff for his or her own injury i.e the plaintiff's damage compensation is reduced by percentage of his/her percentage of fault.
<em>If this law of comparative negligence applies to this state, then Ramona will get 100% - 20% = 80% of the damages incurred in the accident, from John</em>
this is 80% of $100,00 which is equal to <em>$80,000</em>
Answer:
$9.63
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
Year Annual dividend paid
1 $1.20
2 $1.12
3 $1.12
4 $14.20
Now,
Year Annual dividend paid Present value factor Present value
1 $1.20 0.84246 1.011
2 $1.12 0.84246 0.7949
3 $1.12 0.59793 0.6696
4 $14.20 0.50373 7.1529
===============================================================
Worth of stock = 1.011 + 0.7949 + 0.6696 + 7.1529
= $9.6284 ≈ $9.63
Note:
Present value factor = [ 1 ÷ (1 + 0.187)ⁿ]
here,
n is the year
Many activists and watchdogs argue that Google has not always done enough to promote or even protect human rights around the world. This is usually the result of efforts by Google to market its search engine in nations like China, where the state has an interest in maintaining censorship of search results. The project, known as Dragonfly, was recently abandoned by Google.
In recent years, Google was among the companies that faced criticism for marketing an app that allowed men in Saudi Arabia to track the locations of their wives by using their cell phones. This was seen as an affront to women's rights, and the company withdrew the product after criticism from the media and shareholders. Google's interest in artificial intelligence has also led to criticism about its commitment to ethical practices and to human rights.
At the same time, there is no doubt that Google has expanded people's access to information and to many other online services around the world. It has made several global public statements against censorship. Its most vocal critics, indeed, have pointed to its previous stands for free access to information in pointing out the hypocrisy of Dragonfly and other ventures.
