Taking into account the statement above
"The author of this selection describes many of Tom Brown's
skills in reading footprints. The most difficult claim to believe
is that Tom Brown can —"
The answer is that Tom Brown can allowed the military to move people and supplies further.
The first and foremost purpose of Roman roads was military. This allowed that rlthe roman soldiers and their supplies to move faster and further to areas of conflict.
Answer:
By the late nineteenth century, big businesses and giant corporations had taken over the American economy. Consumers were forced to pay high prices for things they needed on a regular basis, and it became clear that reform of regulations in industry was required. The loudest outcry was against trusts and monopolies. Trusts are the organization of several businesses in the same industry and by joining forces, the trust controls production and distribution of a product or service, thereby limiting competition. Monopolies are businesses that have total control over a sector of the economy, including prices.
Trusts are problematic for several reasons. Monopolies develop from trusts and give total control of a specific industry to one group of companies. Owners and top-level executives of monopolies profit greatly, but smaller businesses and companies have no chance to make money at all. Trusts also upset the idea of capitalism, the economic theory upon which the American economy is built. In a capitalist society, all businesses have an equal opportunity to thrive based on competition. When monopolies and trusts exist, competition cannot.
Answer:
It's D
Explanation:
A)Roman families worshipped one all-powerful god.
B)O Most Roman children attended religious schools.
C)Most Roman men became messengers of the gods.
D)Roman families prayed around shrines at home each day.
The Arrival of Railroads
A Railroad is like a Transport of things like a train. you can transport people from place to place with railroads or you can transport supplies
Hope this helps
Answer: The Court upheld the reporting and disclaimer requirements for independent expenditures and electioneering communications. The Court's ruling did not affect the ban on corporate contributions.
Explanation:no cap
