1. Railroad can now give supplies better but now many are homeless
2. Think of it simplistically, if an employer can pay 5 people with $10 each (just an example), and then now the employer is forced to give each person $12.50, that means he’s now forced to lay off one of those 5 people so the other 4 people can have $12.50 each.
Basically it results in employees making more money, but also that other employees suffer and lose their jobs because of it. People want to raise minimum wage until they lose their jobs lol
Answer:
he Harlem Renaissance was a cultural movement in the United States that spanned the 1920s and 1930s. While the zenith of the movement occurred between 1924 and 1929, its ideas have lived on much longer. At the time, it was known as the New Negro Movement, named after the 1925 anthology by Alain Locke.
Explanation:
Answer:Diplomacy is the act of managaing international relations through various activities, including talks, forums etc.
Country's are often represented by 'Diplomats' who work on behalf of their country to ensure strong foriegn relations.
Some examples of diplomats can include counsel general, ambassadors etc.
In this example, the US is sending a format, government approved represenatives to another country in order to persudate them to adopt an environment protection policy that the US believes in. This is pure diplomacy at work where human to human interaction and goodwill is being used to create benefits for the United States.
Read more on Brainly.com - brainly.com/question/10138075#readmore
Explanation:
Explain how absolute advantage and comparative advantage differ. Absolute advantage is the ability to produce a good using fewer inputs than another producer, while comparative advantage is the ability to produce a good at a lower opportunity cost than another producer (reflecting the relative opportunity cost).
To begin with, a journal is a problematic source of information because it is usually the impressions of the person who writes it, and therefore they are very subjective. In the case raised, the journal is even more problematic because it is written by a citien of East Berlin in a period marked by political ideology.
To check if it is a reliable source, I would begin by trying to find out as much information as possible about the person who writes it to get an idea of his or her personal and ideological background since it will set the tone of the narration: ideology, in which area of East Berlin he or she lived, where he or she worked.
Secondly, I would look for other contrasted sources that mention this journal to know if it has already been taken into account and studied or if it has been discredited.
Then, in order to contrast the information present in the journal, I would look for specific places, dates and events reported by the writer and compare them to newspapers, periodical reports from that time or other bibliographical sources (public libraries or databases) to assess the author's rigour.
In no case would I study the journal as an isolated source without comparing it to others to interpret the information available.
