<span>The marginal propensity to consume is a metric
that quantifies the concept of increase in consumption with an increase in
income. Mathematically MPC is defined as:</span>
MPC = Change in consumption / Change in income
Purchase of goods and services is considered as
consumption, therefore:
Change in consumption = $16 billion
In the government’s perspective, taxes are
considered as income, therefore the problem ask us to find for the necessary change
in tax collection to maintain equilibrium GDP. Substituting the values in the
formula:
0.80 = $16 billion / Change in income
Change in income = $20 billion
<span>Therefore the government should increase the tax collection by $20
billion.</span>
Answer:
A) Product Differentiation
Explanation:
Product differentiation is referred as a strategy which companies or firms use to showcase the abilities which their products have and the competing product does not have. Some go as far as displaying an added advantage which their products have. Forms which this strategy can take may be through price of the product, reliability of the product or location of the product.
The most important claim about Karl Marx would be the theorizing that capitalists would try to get more work from people for less pay.
<h3 /><h3>Who was Karl Marx?</h3>
He was a German philosopher who developed the foundations of communism, a system that criticized capitalism and its doctrines. His most prominent theories are about the transition to communism, the class struggle, the Marxist theory of ideology and surplus value.
Therefore, the correct option for the question refers to surplus value, which was defined for Karl Marx as the difference between the value of the work produced by employees and their salary paid. For him, the surplus value is the work produced and not paid, being a condition of exploration of the capitalist system.
Find out more about Karl Marx here:
brainly.com/question/1092276
#SPJ1
Answer: Trade between the two countries is beneficial when United States trade food to Canada and Canada would trade televisions to the United States.
Explanation: In international trade, each country will produce a good in which it has a comparative advantage (lower opportunity cost).
Opportunity cost of food is,
Unites states = 
Canada = 
Opportunity cost of television is,
Unites states = 
Canada = 
Since, opportunity cost of food is lower in the United states, United states will export food.
Opportunity cost of television is lower in Canada, Canada will export television to the United States.
