1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
djyliett [7]
3 years ago
13

In which landmark case did the Supreme Court rule that prior restraint could be used only to prevent the release of information

that would directly imperil the country's war effort?
A. Branzburg v. Hayes
B. New York Times v. United States
C. Detroit Free Press v. Ashcroft
D. Near v. Minnesota
History
2 answers:
Leni [432]3 years ago
8 0
The correct answer is B) New York Times v. United States. It meant that prior restraint could be used only to prevent the release of information that would directly imperil the country's war effort.
Svetach [21]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

New York Times v. United States

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Rate mi bestie 1 - 10 pls dont delete
Viktor [21]

Answer:

Where?

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What were two reasons why Reconstruction was not as successful as the Union hoped?
Agata [3.3K]

Answer:

i had this qustion in my class and here was my two ansers that i got correct.

1. the souths econmy remained agricultural and burdened by dedt.

2. the nation was still deeply divided socially and politically.

Explanation:

sry this is 5 days late hope this helped!

5 0
3 years ago
These factors led to World War ll. Select all that apply.
7nadin3 [17]
Conflicting ideologies, depression, division of cultural groups, invasion of Poland
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following statements about Edward McCabe is not true? A. McCabe served in the Oklahoma territorial government in ma
SashulF [63]

Answer:

d) mccabe was elected the first black territorial governor in oklahoma

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
What is Alexander’s purpose in this speech?
gtnhenbr [62]

Answer:

From a speech given by Alexander is to encourage his army to have confidence.

Explanation:

The Alexander's speech is to motivate his army that they can fight as the war this is between the victorious army and with the enemy who was already defeated. Anyways the opponents are going to fight for only the pay but not more than that. He also said to his army that although the danger has come to you, you didn't step back and look forward to winning the war. By these sentences by Alexander, we came to know that the purpose of the speech is to encourage his army to have confidence.

5 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What was the financial power of Congress under the Articles of Confederation?
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following played a part in the development of Hebrew religious ideas? A. The Ten Commandments became part of Hebrew
    15·2 answers
  • Which part of a map tells you the subject of a map
    15·1 answer
  • What is true of representative money? Check all that apply.
    8·2 answers
  • What do a control group and an experimental group have in common?
    13·2 answers
  • does anybody know if there is a downloadable version of this book online if so can you send me the link please
    5·1 answer
  • U.S history pleaseeeeee help!!
    12·1 answer
  • What is individual's role in preserving ancient monuments?​
    6·1 answer
  • HOW DID THOMAS JEFFERSON AND HIS DEMOCRATIC REPUBLICAN PHILOSOPHY IMPACT THE PRESIDENCY AND AMERICA?
    6·1 answer
  • Read this quotation by Thomas Jefferson from a debate about the national bank. To take a single step beyond the boundaries thus
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!