All categories

3 years ago

When actively listening, it is not necessary to show agreement with the message. True False

1 answer:

7 0

The answer is A) True because when someone is telling u something, u should always show that u are listening to them because it can be like this example here. Say for ex You and your wife are on your own private jet to fly to the Bahamas and your pilot passes out and there is no backup, in most cases u would usually call the emergency phone line and ask them how to fly this machine, when they call u back to give u the instructions, u HAVE to be listening, even if it is long or even boring to u, u HAVE to listen since your own very life is on the line, so that's why it applies back with use because if we are not carefully listening, even to anybody, if it is BIG or small, we should always show them we are aware and we are giving them our attention.

You might be interested in

How are random events taken into consideration during both hindsight bias and overconfidence?

Orlov [11]

The hindsight bias and overconfidence, plus our eagerness to perceive patterns in random events, can cause tendencies that may lead us to overestimate our intuition. Intuition and intellect are not always accurate, therefore these factors are not trustworthy compared to scientific facts or scientific inquiry which can help us overcome our intuition’s biases and shortcomings.

6 0

4 years ago

The time value of money suggests that $1 in one year from now is worth less than $1 today.True / False.

mash [69]

Answer:

False, we conclude that $1 in one year from now is worth more than that of today.

Explanation:

The time value of money (TVM) is concept that suggests money available at present time is worth more than identical sum in future due to potential earning capacity.

This core principle in finance holds that the provided money can earn interest , and any amount of money is worth more the sooner it is received.

Also future money is not affected by inflation, only present money is.

Hence we conclude that $1 in one year from now is worth more than that of today.

4 0

4 years ago

Suppose the wage increases to $200.00200.00 but that the firm chooses to keep using the same amount of labor and capital to pro

tekilochka [14]

Question:

The question is incomplete. See the complete question below and the graph.

You are given the following data;

Cost = C = $12,000.00

w = $100.00 per unit of labor

r = $100.00 per unit of capital

These data are used to construct the isocost line (C) in the diagram to the right. Suppose the wage increases to $200.00 but that the firm chooses to keep using the same amount of labor and capital to produce 200 units of output. Given this new set of factor prices (w'=$200.00, r = $100.00), how much have costs changed if the set of input choices remains at point A? Enter a numeric response using a real number rounded to two decimal places.)

Answer:

Cost change = $6,000

Explanation:

Given Data:

Cost = C = $12,000.00

w = $100.00 per unit of labor

r = $100.00 per unit of capital

Calculating the cost incurred at point A using the equation of iso-costline C¹, we have;

C = wl + rk

where;

C = total cost

w = price of labor = $100

l = labor = 60 unit from the graph

k = capital = 60 unit from the graph

r = price of capital = $100

Substituting into the formula, we have

C = wl + rk

= 100*60 + 100*60

= 6000+6000

= $12,000

For increase in wages(w= $200, r = $100) with same amount of labor and capital, the cost incurred becomes;

C = wl + rk

= 200*60+100*60

= 12,000 + 6000

= $18,000

Therefore,

Cost change = 18000-12000

= $6,000

See the attached graph.

6 0

3 years ago

Kate invests $500 at the beginning of each year for 12 years into a fund earning an effective annual interest rate of 5%. Intere

natali 33 [55]

Answer:

$7,888.55

Explanation:

we can prepare Katie's expected balance on her accounts:

end of year 1 = $500 x (1 + 5%) = $525

end of year 2 = $525 + [$525 x (1 + 4%)] = $1,071

end of year 3 = $525 + [$1,071 x (1 + 4%)] = $1,638.84

end of year 4 = $525 + [$1,638.84 x (1 + 4%)] = $2,229.39

end of year 5 = $525 + [$2,229.39 x (1 + 4%)] = $2,843.57

end of year 6 = $525 + [$2,843.57 x (1 + 4%)] = $3,482.31

end of year 7 = $525 + [$3,482.31 x (1 + 4%)] = $4,146.60

end of year 8 = $525 + [$4,146.60 x (1 + 4%)] = $4,837.47

end of year 9 = $525 + [$4,837.47 x (1 + 4%)] = $5,555.97

end of year 10 = $525 + [$5,555.97 x (1 + 4%)] = $6,303.21

end of year 11 = $525 + [$6,303.21 x (1 + 4%)] = $7,080.33

end of year 12 = $525 + [$7,080.33 x (1 + 4%)] = $7,888.55

8 0

4 years ago

Managing the Toronto Propane Explosion

Elena-2011 [213]

Answer:

Explanation:

1. Summary of Toronto Propane Explosion

The Toronto propane explosion (also known as the Sunrise Propane incident) was a series of explosions and ensuing fire that took place on the morning of August 10, 2008, in Downsview, North York, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.The explosions occurred at the Sunrise Propane Industrial Gases propane facility, located near Keele Street and Wilson Avenue . The blasts caused thousands of people to be evacuated from their homes and cost C$1.8 million to clean up, half of which was paid by the province of Ontario. An employee of Sunrise died in the initial explosions and a firefighter died of cardiac arrest the next day while at the scene.

2. Why did the TSSA become the "culprit" here

They are culprit because they failed to protect the civilian by ensuring public safety—it’s the cornerstone that TSSA is built on. And while owners, contractors and residence play their parts in helping keep everyone safe, it’s TSSA who enforces, inspects and advocates for the public.

3. Why did the TSSA become the target of the media and public opinion?

TSSA did not make a Moves to Improve Safety in Ontario explosion which claims a lot of damages.

4. What would you advise the minister to do?

The minister should establish a law to revoke any company that violate its obligation liscense

4 0

3 years ago