The answer is, A and B. Bats, and Trees
Here are the effects that the foreshadowing in Friar Laurence's warning to Romeo had:
A. <span>It keeps the audience engaged in the plot by suggesting more potential conflict in the story.
C. </span><span>It creates suspense as the reader wonders why Friar Laurence would utter this warning.
E. </span><span>It provides a clue that something tragic will happen to the lovers later as the story progresses.
B is incorrect because it is a foreshadowing, not an explanation. D is incorrect because the friar cannot predict the future, it is a warning. </span>
Incomplete question. However, I assumed you are referring to the story, "Fahrenheit" 451 by Ray Bradbury.
<u>Explanation:</u>
For example, in the novel, the character Clarisse is portrayed as someone who appreciates nature, so much so that she finds time always to observe creation even though most people in her community are preoccupied with work and entertainment that they lack the time to do so.
Another character is Mildred, the wife of Montag, she is portrayed as someone who has a love for entertainment that is so strong to the extent it overshadows that of her husband. Her behavior contrast with that of Clarisse who has a healthy view of entertainment.
What the author, Montag is saying through his characters is that
- those in his society do not value human life, recall we were told the police don't punish those who over speed, thus accidents occur often.
- those in his society are less concerned about their families; which was made evident in the case of Mildred.
In his most famous and eloquent dissent, Harlan held that “our Constitution is color-blind,” that “in this country there is no superior, dominant ruling class of citizens,” and that it is wrong to allow the states to “regulate the enjoyment of citizens' civil rights solely on the basis of race.
Hoped this worked :)