When comparing Mexico to Scotland, you would expect Scottish workers to have greater productivity and higher labour cost per worker
Explanation:
One may expect that a Scotland plant will be less labour intensive and efficient per worker than just Mexican facilities as a more advanced technological nation and that "higher productivity and low labour cost" will be the right answer.
Both possibilities for lower productivity can be excluded as they demonstrate lower productivity. "Higher productivity, but less energy per job" is not the solution because it recognises lower labour costs per worker rather than higher.
The increase in labour productivity relies, according to certain studies, on three key factors: innovation and capital goods saving, modern technology and human capital.
Answer:
B. $12,000 is a sunk cost
Explanation:
By considering the given information, the cost that is correct is a sunk cost for $12,000
The sunk cost is the cost already incurred and will not be retrieved in the future. Plus, it's also termed a past cost.
It is a useless cost and it can be avoided also.
It is that cost that is not considered at the time of decisions making.
So, option B is correct
Hi I think it might be the second option: <u>You can specialize in mechanics and still be able to feed your family without growing your own food.</u> I say this because the key word specialization used in the question and specialize.
Honestly taking a test with this same question at the moment and i am just taking a wild guess here. Im sorry if i got it wrong but good luck.
Answer:
Explanation:
Having a strong work ethic involves upholding the values and goals of the company by performing your job to the best of your ability. It means focusing on completing assigned tasks on time. An employee with a strong work ethic is professional in attitude and appearance.
Answer:
combining shopmente6of prod6
