Answer:
See the explanation below.
Explanation:
The court likely to rule in favor of Ewing.
The reason is that the enough consideration that gives backing to a promise in this case is generally the waiver of a legal right to eat to obesity as requested by the other party.
The evidence that Ewing has lost 154 pounds in weight over the stipulated period is a consideration that sufficient enough under the law. The payment of $10 pound that Ewing has lost is a promise. The fact that Ewing also benefit from the weight loss does not matter.
Answer:
8.94%
Explanation:
Firstly, we will need to find total equity and total debt of Harrington Inc inorder to apply the Dupont equation for getting ROE
Harrington's total debt = 15.00 % × $250,000
= $37,500
Harrington's total equity will be; applying accounting equation
Asset = Liabilities + Owner's equity
Owner's equity = Assets - Liabilities
= $250,000 - $37,500
= $212,500
Therefore, using the Dupont equation, we can calculate the ROE as;
(NI/Sales) × (Sales/Total assets) × (Total assets/Total common equity)
= 19,000/325,000 × 325,000 /250,000 × 250,000/212,500
= 8.94%
<span>A court ruling against the wrongful dismissal of employees is a development in the political or legal component of the general. Wrongful dismissal or termination of contract of employment without proper process violates the law of contracts. When this happens, the court takes the employee's rights into consideration in filing damages.</span>
Answer:
Explanation:
Q(8) =15 - 0.5 x 10 - 0.8 x 8 = 15-5-6.4=3.6
Q(10) =15 - 0.5 x 10 - 0.8 x 10 =15-5-8= 2
Cross Elasticity = -0.2 / 0.8 = -0.4
It's a <span>partnership. I have to write more words but that's what that arrangement is.</span>
